Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Comparison of the Radiologic Outcomes following the Kinds of Implants in Treating Unstable Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Fracture

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김, 광균-
dc.contributor.author원, 예연-
dc.contributor.author이, 우석-
dc.contributor.author조, 인호-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-18T04:48:23Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-18T04:48:23Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn2093-9361-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/10635-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine whether kinds of implants would influence on the radiologic outcomes in the treatment of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures.



Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, radiologic outcomes of 151 patients with unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures undergoing surgical treatments were compared based on the types of fixation implants as follows : PFNA (53 cases, group Ⅰ), gamma nail 3(31 cases, group Ⅱ), CHS with TSP (43 cases, group Ⅲ), and helical blade type LCP-DHS with TSP (24 cases, group Ⅳ). On the follow-up radiographs after operations, we assessed differences of bone union durations, neck-shaft ankle changes, lag screw or helical blade slippages, and varus alpha angle changes among the study groups.



Results: All the radiologic outcomes evaluated in this study were not significantly different among the study groups. The average bone union durations of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 17.7, 18.0, 18.2, and 17.8 weeks, respectively (P=0.429). The average variation of neck-shaft angle of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 3.6o, 3.1o, 3.7o and 2.9o, respectively (P=0.273). The average lag screw or blade slippage of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 5.1 mm, 3.3 mm, 3.6 mm and 2.7 mm, respectively (P=0.154). The average variation of varus alpha of the group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 5.3o, 4.7o, 4.1o and 4.6º, respectively (P=0.894).



Conclusions: This study indicates that four typical types of fixation implants for treating unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures would not lead to differences in postoperative radiological outcomes.
-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.titleComparison of the Radiologic Outcomes following the Kinds of Implants in Treating Unstable Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Fracture-
dc.title.alternative골다공증성 불안정 대퇴골 전자간 골절에서 내고정물의 종류에 따른 방사선학적 결과 비교-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.koreanosteoporosis.or.kr/journal/view.html?book=Journal&start=0&scale=10&key=&key_word=&Vol=011&Num=01&PG=&year1=&year2=&sort=Regnum-0&aut_box=Y&sub_box=Y&sos_box=&key_box=&pub_box=Y&abs_box=&mod=vol&sflag=&uid=&multi%5B%5D=243-
dc.subject.keywordUnstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture-
dc.subject.keywordProximal femoral nail antirotation-
dc.subject.keywordCompression hip screw-
dc.subject.keywordGamma nail-
dc.subject.keywordLocking compression plate dynamic hip screw-
dc.subject.keywordRadiologic results-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor원, 예연-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.citation.titleOsteoporosis-
dc.citation.volume11-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.date2013-
dc.citation.startPage19-
dc.citation.endPage25-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationOsteoporosis, 11(1). : 19-25, 2013-
dc.relation.journalidJ020939361-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Orthopedic Surgery
Files in This Item:
Osteoporosis_11(1)_19-25.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse