Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Differential prognostic impact of treatment strategy among patients with left main versus non-left main bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSong, YB-
dc.contributor.authorHahn, JY-
dc.contributor.authorYang, JH-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, SH-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, JH-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SH-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, MH-
dc.contributor.authorKim, HS-
dc.contributor.authorLee, JH-
dc.contributor.authorYu, CW-
dc.contributor.authorRha, SW-
dc.contributor.authorJang, Y-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, JH-
dc.contributor.authorTahk, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorSeung, KB-
dc.contributor.authorOh, JH-
dc.contributor.authorPark, JS-
dc.contributor.authorGwon, HC-
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-06T05:56:32Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-06T05:56:32Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1936-8798-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/12355-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate whether the impact of treatment

strategies on clinical outcomes differed between patients with left main (LM)

bifurcation lesions and those with non-LM bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Few

studies have considered anatomic location when comparing 1- and 2-stent

strategies for bifurcation lesions. METHODS: We compared the prognostic impact of

treatment strategies on clinical outcomes in 2,044 patients with non-LM

bifurcation lesions and 853 with LM bifurcation lesions. The primary outcome was

target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial

infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: The 2-stent

strategy was used more frequently in the LM bifurcation group than in the non-LM

bifurcation group (40.3% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.01). During a median follow-up of 36

months, the 2-stent strategy was not associated with a higher incidence of

cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to

2.14; p = 0.44), cardiac death or MI (HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.58 to 2.19; p = 0.73),

or TLF (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.94; p = 0.06) in the non-LM bifurcation

group. In contrast, in patients with LM bifurcation lesions, the 2-stent strategy

was associated with a higher incidence of cardiac death (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.05

to 5.59; p = 0.04), cardiac death or MI (HR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.04; p =

0.03), as well as TLF (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.60 to 3.55; p < 0.01). Significant

interactions were present between treatment strategies and bifurcation lesion

locations for TLF (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-stent strategy, if possible,

should initially be considered the preferred approach for the treatment of

coronary bifurcation lesions, especially LM bifurcation lesions. (Korean Coronary

Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry II; NCT01642992).
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHCause of Death-
dc.subject.MESHConfidence Intervals-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Angiography-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Vessels-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIncidence-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPercutaneous Coronary Intervention-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications-
dc.subject.MESHPractice Guidelines as Topic-
dc.subject.MESHProsthesis Design-
dc.subject.MESHRegistries-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHStents-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Rate-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleDifferential prognostic impact of treatment strategy among patients with left main versus non-left main bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid24529936-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879814000478-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor탁, 승제-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.009-
dc.citation.titleJACC. Cardiovascular interventions-
dc.citation.volume7-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.date2014-
dc.citation.startPage255-
dc.citation.endPage263-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 7(3). : 255-263, 2014-
dc.identifier.eissn1876-7605-
dc.relation.journalidJ019368798-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Cardiology
Files in This Item:
24529936.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse