Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Diagnostic properties of the methacholine and mannitol bronchial challenge tests: a comparison study.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, MH-
dc.contributor.authorSong, WJ-
dc.contributor.authorKim, TW-
dc.contributor.authorJin, HJ-
dc.contributor.authorSin, YS-
dc.contributor.authorYe, YM-
dc.contributor.authorKim, SH-
dc.contributor.authorPark, HW-
dc.contributor.authorLee, BJ-
dc.contributor.authorPark, HS-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, HJ-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, DC-
dc.contributor.authorMin, KU-
dc.contributor.authorCho, SH-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-04T05:07:09Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-04T05:07:09Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1323-7799-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/12589-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Airway hyperresponsiveness is a common feature of

asthma. Methacholine and mannitol are two representative agonists for bronchial

challenge. They have theoretically different mechanisms of action, and may have

different diagnostic properties. However, their difference has not been directly

evaluated among Korean adults. In this study, we compare the diagnostic

properties of methacholine and mannitol bronchial provocation tests. METHODS:

Asthmatic patients and non-asthmatic controls were recruited prospectively from

four referral hospitals in Korea. Participants were challenged with each of

methacholine and mannitol inhalation on different days. Their diagnostic utility

was evaluated by calculating their sensitivity and specificity for asthma

diagnosis. Response-dose ratio was also compared. RESULTS: A total of 50

asthmatic adults and 54 controls were enrolled (mean age 43.8 years). The

sensitivity and specificity of mannitol challenge (defined by a PD15 of <635 mg)

were 48.0% and 92.6%, respectively, whereas those of methacholine (defined by a

PC20 of <16 mg/mL) were 42.0% and 98.1%, respectively. Twenty asthmatic

participants (24%) showed positive response to a single agonist only. In the

receiver operating curve analyses using response-dose ratio values, area under

the curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.86) for mannitol, and

0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.95) for methacholine. The correlations between log-

transformed mannitol and methacholine response-dose ratios were significant but

moderate (r = 0.683, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated

overall similar diagnostic properties of two diagnostic tests, but also suggested

their intercomplementary roles for asthma. The clinical trial registration number

at ClinicalTrial.gov is NCT02104284.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAsthma-
dc.subject.MESHBronchial Provocation Tests-
dc.subject.MESHCase-Control Studies-
dc.subject.MESHDose-Response Relationship, Drug-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLung-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMannitol-
dc.subject.MESHMethacholine Chloride-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHROC Curve-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.titleDiagnostic properties of the methacholine and mannitol bronchial challenge tests: a comparison study.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid24975800-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/resp.12334/abstract;jsessionid=B8DE19F0C092C4B541474499E059B27A.f01t03-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor신, 유섭-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor예, 영민-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박, 해심-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/resp.12334-
dc.citation.titleRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.date2014-
dc.citation.startPage852-
dc.citation.endPage856-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRespirology (Carlton, Vic.), 19(6). : 852-856, 2014-
dc.identifier.eissn1440-1843-
dc.relation.journalidJ013237799-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Allergy
Files in This Item:
24975800.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse