Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Comparison of potential risks between intracranial and extracranial vertebral artery dissections.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorShin, DH-
dc.contributor.authorHong, JM-
dc.contributor.authorLee, JS-
dc.contributor.authorNasim, R-
dc.contributor.authorSohn, SI-
dc.contributor.authorKim, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorBang, OY-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-24T05:26:28Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-24T05:26:28Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0014-3022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/12695-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND/AIMS: To better understand potential risks for vertebral artery (VA)

dissection (VAD), we compared intracranial and extracranial VADs. METHODS: We

analyzed consecutively admitted VAD patients over a 9-year period in whom VAD was

confirmed by angiography. All patients were categorized as having intracranial or

extracranial VAD, and demographic and radiological characteristics of VAD were

compared. We used multivariate analysis to predict the risks for intracranial and

extracranial VADs. RESULTS: The study population (n = 74) had a mean age of 46.0

+/- 10.3 years. VAD was more frequent in the nondominant VA (n = 49,

66.2%).Vertical nidus of VAD was more common in the intracranial segment (81.1%),

and more particularly it was most frequently located within a 2-mm perimeter of

the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) orifice (60.0%). Absence of

traumatic history (OR 13.1, 95% CI 1.6-107.4; p = 0.016), history of hypertension

(OR 14.1, 95% CI 1.1-184.6; p = 0.043)and aging (OR 1.1 per 1-year increase, 95%

CI 1.0-1.2; p =0.038) were independent predictors of intracranial VAD.

CONCLUSION: As compared to extracranial VAD, intracranial VAD was particularly

frequent and particularly vulnerable at the perimeters of the PICA and

nondominant VA and was associated with an absent trauma history, hypertension and

aging. Formation of VAD appeared to be different according to intracranial or

extracranial involvement.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAngiography, Digital Subtraction-
dc.subject.MESHCerebral Angiography-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Angiography-
dc.subject.MESHMultivariate Analysis-
dc.subject.MESHRisk-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed-
dc.subject.MESHVertebral Artery-
dc.subject.MESHVertebral Artery Dissection-
dc.titleComparison of potential risks between intracranial and extracranial vertebral artery dissections.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid24662973-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/357867-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor홍, 지만-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이, 진수-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000357867-
dc.citation.titleEuropean neurology-
dc.citation.volume71-
dc.citation.number5-6-
dc.citation.date2014-
dc.citation.startPage305-
dc.citation.endPage312-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEuropean neurology, 71(5-6). : 305-312, 2014-
dc.identifier.eissn1421-9913-
dc.relation.journalidJ000143022-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Neurology
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse