Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Surgical outcomes of primary and revision augmentation rhinoplasty using a processed fascia lata.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, YS-
dc.contributor.authorPark, DY-
dc.contributor.authorShin, DH-
dc.contributor.authorYang, SM-
dc.contributor.authorSeong, SY-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, JH-
dc.contributor.authorKim, CH-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-26T04:29:11Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-26T04:29:11Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1945-8924-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/13944-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Dorsal augmentation is the most commonly performed procedure in rhinoplasty for Asian patients. Due to the anatomic features of the Asian nose, the use of nonautologous materials to obtain a proper degree of augmentation is inevitable in most cases. Because the use of nonautologous materials possesses a higher risk of complications, surgeons are concerned about selecting suitable materials for the procedure, especially in revision rhinoplasty. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the suitability and usefulness of a homologous material, Tutoplast-processed fascia lata (TPFL), in revision augmentation rhinoplasty.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 104 rhinoplasty patients (primary, 86; revision, 18) who had undergone dorsal augmentation using TPFL was conducted. The comparison of surgical outcomes between primary and revision surgery was made using objective [dorsal height (DH) and radix height (RH), complication rate] and subjective (patient satisfaction) parameters.

RESULTS: The degree of augmentation represented by DH and RH was comparable between primary and revision rhinoplasty using TPFL. In comparing the rate of postoperative complications, only minor incidents were noted, in six cases after primary surgery and in one case after revision surgery. Patient satisfaction was measured in both primary and revision augmentation, with a significant difference observed between the two groups (40.57 ± 9.25 versus 31.48 ± 7.59; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: TPFL is a feasible implant material that delivers suitable augmentation and patient satisfaction with minimal morbidity in both primary and revision rhinoplasty.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHBiocompatible Materials-
dc.subject.MESHFascia Lata-
dc.subject.MESHFeasibility Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHNose-
dc.subject.MESHPatient Satisfaction-
dc.subject.MESHPolytetrafluoroethylene-
dc.subject.MESHProstheses and Implants-
dc.subject.MESHProsthesis Implantation-
dc.subject.MESHReoperation-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRhinoplasty-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleSurgical outcomes of primary and revision augmentation rhinoplasty using a processed fascia lata.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid25785756-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.ingentaconnect.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1945-8924&volume=29&issue=2&spage=141&aulast=Kim-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김, 유석-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4138-
dc.citation.titleAmerican journal of rhinology & allergy-
dc.citation.volume29-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.date2015-
dc.citation.startPage141-
dc.citation.endPage144-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAmerican journal of rhinology & allergy, 29(2). : 141-144, 2015-
dc.identifier.eissn1945-8932-
dc.relation.journalidJ019458924-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Otolaryngology
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse