Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Is It Beneficial to Remove the Pedicle Screw Instrument After Successful Posterior Fusion of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures?

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJeon, CH-
dc.contributor.authorLee, HD-
dc.contributor.authorLee, YS-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, JH-
dc.contributor.authorChung, NS-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-12T05:19:09Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-12T05:19:09Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn0362-2436-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/14010-
dc.description.abstractSTUDY DESIGN: Case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of pedicle screw removal after successful fusion of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Implant removal is a common procedure in orthopedic surgery, although the benefits of and indications for removal remain controversial. Previous studies on pedicle screw removal have reported conflicting outcomes, because the study subjects and surgical goals were heterogeneous in nature.

METHODS: We studied 45 consecutive patients who underwent implant removal and a control cohort of 45 age- and sex-matched patients who retained their spinal implants after successful posterior fusion of thoracolumbar burst fractures using pedicle screw instrument. In most cases, long-segment instrumentation with short-segment posterior fusion was performed. The mean elapsed period prior to implant removal after index fracture surgery was 18.3 ± 17.6 months. A visual analogue scale for back pain was applied, the Oswestry disability index calculated, and radiological parameters derived at the time of implant removal and 1 and 2 years postoperatively obtained. These data were compared with those of the control group evaluated at the same times after index fracture surgery.

RESULTS: Patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, fracture morphologies, and the outcomes of index fracture surgery were similar between the 2 groups. The mean visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index scores were better at both the 1- and 2-year follow-ups in the implant removal group than in the control group (all P values = 0.000). The segmental motion angle of the implant removal group was 1.6° ± 1.5° at the time of implant removal, and increased significantly to 5.8° ± 3.9° at 1-year follow-up (P = 0.000), and was maintained at this level at the 2-year follow-up (5.9° ± 4.1°) (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION: In patients treated successfully for thoracolumbar burst fractures, pedicle screw removal is beneficial because it alleviates pain and disability. Restoration of the segmental motion angle after implant removal may contribute to the clinical improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAdolescent-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHBack Pain-
dc.subject.MESHBone Screws-
dc.subject.MESHCase-Control Studies-
dc.subject.MESHDevice Removal-
dc.subject.MESHDisability Evaluation-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHFracture Fixation, Internal-
dc.subject.MESHFracture Healing-
dc.subject.MESHFractures, Compression-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLumbar Vertebrae-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPain Measurement-
dc.subject.MESHRadiography-
dc.subject.MESHRange of Motion, Articular-
dc.subject.MESHSpinal Fractures-
dc.subject.MESHSpinal Fusion-
dc.subject.MESHThoracic Vertebrae-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titleIs It Beneficial to Remove the Pedicle Screw Instrument After Successful Posterior Fusion of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid26091158-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0362-2436&volume=40&issue=11&spage=E627-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor전, 창훈-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor정, 남수-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/BRS.0000000000000870-
dc.citation.titleSpine-
dc.citation.volume40-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.date2015-
dc.citation.startPageE627-
dc.citation.endPageE633-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSpine, 40(11). : E627-E633, 2015-
dc.identifier.eissn1528-1159-
dc.relation.journalidJ003622436-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Orthopedic Surgery
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse