Cited 0 times in
Relationship Between the Size of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and Positron Emission Tomographic/Computer Tomographic Findings in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, SY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, DJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, HS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yun, MJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, JW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, CK | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-14T06:30:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-14T06:30:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0364-2313 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/14173 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: We measured the sizes of metastatic lymph nodes and the relationships thereof by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT). We identified risk factors for nodal upstaging in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
METHODS: Eighty-five patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy with extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy were assessed. Two radiologists blinded to pathology data reviewed PET/CT scans, evaluating both primary tumors and lymph node involvement. A pathologist examined all metastatic lymph nodes in terms of maximal diameter (LNmax), the size of the metastatic focus (Fmax), and the metastasis occupation ratio (MOR = Fmax/LNmax). RESULTS: The maximal tumor length averaged 2.9 ± 0.2 cm and the mean SUVmax of the primary lesion 5.3 ± 0.5. On PET/CT scans, 26 (30.6 %) patients exhibited nodal metastasis and 59 (69.4 %) did not. Pathology grades of pN0, pN1, pN2, and pN3 were assigned to 45 (52.9 %), 24 (28.2 %), 13 (15.3 %), and 3 (3.5 %) patients, respectively. Nodal upstaging was evident in 29 (34.1 %) cases. In 123 metastatic nodes of 4212 nodes dissected, the LNmax was 6.60 ± 0.39 mm, the Fmax 4.47 ± 0.35 mm, and the MOR 0.68 ± 0.03. Of 123 nodes, 85 (69.1 %) were retrieved from PET-negative stations, and the LNmax and Fmax values of these nodes were 5.88 ± 0.42 and 3.75 ± 0.31 mm, respectively. Upon multivariate analysis, tumor length (OR 1.666, p = 0.019) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 41.038, p < 0.001) were risk factors for nodal upstaging. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of nodal metastases were too small to detect via PET/CT imaging. Therefore, meticulous lymph node dissection might be helpful in ESCC patients. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Blood Vessels | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Carcinoma, Squamous Cell | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Esophageal Neoplasms | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Esophagectomy | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lymph Node Excision | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lymph Nodes | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lymphatic Metastasis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lymphatic Vessels | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Mediastinum | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Multimodal Imaging | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Neoplasm Grading | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Neoplasm Invasiveness | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Neoplasm Staging | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Positron-Emission Tomography | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Radiopharmaceuticals | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Risk Factors | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Tomography, X-Ray Computed | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Tumor Burden | - |
dc.title | Relationship Between the Size of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and Positron Emission Tomographic/Computer Tomographic Findings in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 26324159 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 박, 성용 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00268-015-3221-3 | - |
dc.citation.title | World journal of surgery | - |
dc.citation.volume | 39 | - |
dc.citation.number | 12 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2015 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 2948 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 2954 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | World journal of surgery, 39(12). : 2948-2954, 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1432-2323 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J003642313 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.