Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Feasibility of free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the abdomen: a comparison between CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, Radial-VIBE with KWIC reconstruction and conventional VIBE

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSeo, N-
dc.contributor.authorPark, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorKim, B-
dc.contributor.authorLee, CK-
dc.contributor.authorHuh, J-
dc.contributor.authorKim, JK-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SS-
dc.contributor.authorKim, IS-
dc.contributor.authorNickel, D-
dc.contributor.authorKim, KW-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-04T00:24:55Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-04T00:24:55Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/14928-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibilities of controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration with volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (CAIPIRINHA-VIBE), radial acquisition of VIBE (Radial-VIBE) with k-space-weighted image contrast (KWIC) reconstruction (KWIC-Radial-VIBE) and conventional-VIBE (c-VIBE) for free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI of the abdomen. METHODS: 23 prospectively enrolled patients underwent DCE-MRI of the abdomen with CAIPIRINHA-VIBE (n = 10), KWIC-Radial-VIBE (n = 6) or c-VIBE (n = 7). Qualitative image quality of the DCE-MR images and perfusion maps was independently scored by two abdominal radiologists using a 5-point scale (from 1, uninterpretable, to 5, very good). For quantitative analysis, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver and goodness-of-fit (GOF) of the time-intensity curve were measured. RESULTS: In the three tested sequences, DCE-MRI had good temporal (5 s) and spatial resolution (1.48 x 1.48 x 4 mm/voxel). Interobserver agreement in the qualitative analysis was good (k = 0.753: 95% confidence interval, 0.610-0.895). Therefore, the mean scores were used in the data analysis. Overall image quality was comparable between CAIPIRINHA-VIBE (3.52 +/- 0.55) and KWIC-Radial-VIBE (3.72 +/- 0.37: p = 1.000), and both were significantly better than c-VIBE (2.71 +/- 0.34: p < 0.001). Perfusion map quality score was highest with KWIC-Radial-VIBE (4.33 +/- 0.65), followed by CAIPIRINHA-VIBE (3.70 +/- 0.73) and c-VIBE (3.14 +/- 0.66), but without statistical significance between CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and KWIC-Radial-VIBE (p = 0.167). The SNR of the liver and GOF of the time-intensity curve did not significantly differ between the three sequences (p = 0.116 and 0.224, respectively). CONCLUSION: CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and KWIC-Radial-VIBE provide comparably better performance than c-VIBE. Both can be feasible sequences with acceptable good image quality for free-breathing DCE-MRI. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and KWIC-Radial-VIBE provide comparably better quality of free-breathing DCE-MRIs than c-VIBE.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAbdomen-
dc.subject.MESHContrast Media-
dc.subject.MESHFeasibility Studies-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHImage Enhancement-
dc.subject.MESHImage Interpretation, Computer-Assisted-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSignal-To-Noise Ratio-
dc.titleFeasibility of free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the abdomen: a comparison between CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, Radial-VIBE with KWIC reconstruction and conventional VIBE-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid27504684-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124798/-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김, 보현-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.20160150-
dc.citation.titleThe British journal of radiology-
dc.citation.volume89-
dc.citation.number1066-
dc.citation.date2016-
dc.citation.startPage20160150-
dc.citation.endPage20160150-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationThe British journal of radiology, 89(1066). : 20160150-20160150, 2016-
dc.identifier.eissn1748-880X-
dc.relation.journalidJ000071285-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Radiology
Files in This Item:
27504684.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse