Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Robotic single-site versus laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal tumours: a propensity score-matching analysis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPaek, J-
dc.contributor.authorLee, JD-
dc.contributor.authorKong, TW-
dc.contributor.authorChang, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorRyu, HS-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-04T00:26:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-04T00:26:28Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1478-5951-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/15138-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic single-site (RSS) and laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery for adnexal tumours and evaluate the feasibility of RSS surgery. METHODS: RSS surgery was performed using the da Vinci Single-Site(R) surgical platform and LESS surgery using a single multi-channel port system. Surgical outcomes were compared between RSS (n = 20) and LESS (n = 228) after 1:4 propensity score matching. RESULTS: After the propensity score matching, the RSS group showed longer operating times than the LESS (91.1 vs 66.1 min: p = 0.001). While the LESS showed 1.3% of major complication rates, the RSS group had no perioperative complication. For the LESS, 2.5% of patients needed additional port insertion. CONCLUSIONS: The RSS surgery for adnexal tumours could be performed safely without complications or additional port insertion. Although it showed a longer operating time, further experience and technical refinements will continue to improve operative results. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHEndoscopy-
dc.subject.MESHFallopian Tubes-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHOperative Time-
dc.subject.MESHOvarian Neoplasms-
dc.subject.MESHOvariectomy-
dc.subject.MESHOvary-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Period-
dc.subject.MESHPropensity Score-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRobotic Surgical Procedures-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleRobotic single-site versus laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for adnexal tumours: a propensity score-matching analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid26450129-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor백, 지흠-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor공, 태욱-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor장, 석준-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor유, 희석-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/rcs.1707-
dc.citation.titleThe international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery-
dc.citation.volume12-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.date2016-
dc.citation.startPage694-
dc.citation.endPage700-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationThe international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery, 12(4). : 694-700, 2016-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.identifier.eissn1478-596X-
dc.relation.journalidJ014785951-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Obstetrics & Gynecology
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse