Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Multisite Evaluation of a Data Quality Tool for Patient-Level Clinical Data Sets

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHuser, V-
dc.contributor.authorDeFalco, FJ-
dc.contributor.authorSchuemie, M-
dc.contributor.authorRyan, PB-
dc.contributor.authorShang, N-
dc.contributor.authorVelez, M-
dc.contributor.authorPark, RW-
dc.contributor.authorBoyce, RD-
dc.contributor.authorDuke, J-
dc.contributor.authorKhare, R-
dc.contributor.authorUtidjian, L-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, C-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-03T01:27:04Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-03T01:27:04Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/15479-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Data quality and fitness for analysis are crucial if outputs of analyses of electronic health record data or administrative claims data should be trusted by the public and the research community.
METHODS: We describe a data quality analysis tool (called Achilles Heel) developed by the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics Collaborative (OHDSI) and compare outputs from this tool as it was applied to 24 large healthcare datasets across seven different organizations.
RESULTS: We highlight 12 data quality rules that identified issues in at least 10 of the 24 datasets and provide a full set of 71 rules identified in at least one dataset. Achilles Heel is a freely available software that provides a useful starter set of data quality rules with the ability to add additional rules. We also present results of a structured email-based interview of all participating sites that collected qualitative comments about the value of Achilles Heel for data quality evaluation.
DISCUSSION: Our analysis represents the first comparison of outputs from a data quality tool that implements a fixed (but extensible) set of data quality rules. Thanks to a common data model, we were able to compare quickly multiple datasets originating from several countries in America, Europe and Asia.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleMultisite Evaluation of a Data Quality Tool for Patient-Level Clinical Data Sets-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid28154833-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5226382/-
dc.subject.keywordCommon Data Model-
dc.subject.keywordData Use and Quality-
dc.subject.keywordElectronic Health Record (EHR)-
dc.subject.keywordInformatics-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박, 래웅-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.13063/2327-9214.1239-
dc.citation.titleEGEMS (Washington, DC)-
dc.citation.volume4-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.date2016-
dc.citation.startPage1239-
dc.citation.endPage1239-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEGEMS (Washington, DC), 4(1). : 1239-1239, 2016-
dc.identifier.eissn2327-9214-
dc.relation.journalidJ023279214-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Biomedical Informatics
Files in This Item:
28154833.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse