Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Developing new automated alternation flicker using optic disc photography for the detection of glaucoma progression

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorAhn, J-
dc.contributor.authorYun, IS-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, HG-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, JJ-
dc.contributor.authorLee, M-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-27T00:51:57Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-27T00:51:57Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0950-222X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/15559-
dc.description.abstractPurposeTo evaluate a progression-detecting algorithm for a new automated matched alternation flicker (AMAF) in glaucoma patients.MethodsOpen-angle glaucoma patients with a baseline mean deviation of visual field (VF) test>-6 dB were included in this longitudinal and retrospective study. Functional progression was detected by two VF progression criteria and structural progression by both AMAF and conventional comparison methods using optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) photography. Progression-detecting performances of AMAF and the conventional method were evaluated by an agreement between functional and structural progression criteria. RNFL thickness changes measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) were compared between progressing and stable eyes determined by each method.ResultsAmong 103 eyes, 47 (45.6%), 21 (20.4%), and 32 (31.1%) eyes were evaluated as glaucoma progression using AMAF, the conventional method, and guided progression analysis (GPA) of the VF test, respectively. The AMAF showed better agreement than the conventional method, using GPA of the VF test (kappa=0.337: P<0.001 and kappa=0.124: P=0.191, respectively). The rates of RNFL thickness decay using OCT were significantly different between the progressing and stable eyes when progression was determined by AMAF (-3.49+/-2.86 mum per year vs -1.83+/-3.22 mum per year: P=0.007) but not by the conventional method (-3.24+/-2.42 mum per year vs -2.42+/-3.33 mum per year: P=0.290).ConclusionsThe AMAF was better than the conventional comparison method in discriminating structural changes during glaucoma progression, and showed a moderate agreement with functional progression criteria.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAlgorithms-
dc.subject.MESHDiagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological-
dc.subject.MESHDisease Progression-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGlaucoma, Open-Angle-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNerve Fibers-
dc.subject.MESHOptic Disk-
dc.subject.MESHOptic Nerve Diseases-
dc.subject.MESHPhotography-
dc.subject.MESHRetina-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, Optical Coherence-
dc.subject.MESHVisual Fields-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titleDeveloping new automated alternation flicker using optic disc photography for the detection of glaucoma progression-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid27662466-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5233931/-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor안, 재홍-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor윤, 일석-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/eye.2016.204-
dc.citation.titleEye (London, England)-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.date2017-
dc.citation.startPage119-
dc.citation.endPage126-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEye (London, England), 31(1). : 119-126, 2017-
dc.identifier.eissn1476-5454-
dc.relation.journalidJ00950222X-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Ophthalmology
Files in This Item:
27662466.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse