Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Self-administered health literacy instruments for people with diabetes: systematic review of measurement properties

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, EH-
dc.contributor.authorKim, CJ-
dc.contributor.authorLee, J-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, SH-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-27T00:52:16Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-27T00:52:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/15592-
dc.description.abstractAIMS: The aims of this study were to identify all available self-administered instruments measuring health literacy in people with diabetes and to determine the current instrument that is the most appropriate for applying to this population in both practice and research.
DESIGN: A systematic review of measurement properties.
DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL electronic databases from their inception up to 28 March 2016.
REVIEW METHOD: The methodological quality of each included study was assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. The reported results for measurement properties in the studies were assessed according to Terwee's quality criteria.
RESULTS: Thirteen self-administered instruments measuring health literacy in people with diabetes were identified, of which six (44%) were diabetes-specific instruments. The instruments that covered the broadest contents of health literacy were the Health Literacy Scale and Health Literacy Questionnaire. The (test-retest) reliability, measurement error and responsiveness were not evaluated for any instrument, while internal consistency and hypothesis testing validity were the most frequently assessed measurement properties.
CONCLUSIONS: With the current evidence, the Health Literacy Scale may be the most appropriate instrument for patients with diabetes in practice and research. However, the structural validity of this scale needs to be further established, particularly in other language versions. It is also recommended to use the Diabetes Numeracy Test-15 along with the Health Literacy Scale to complement the lack of numeracy measures in the Health Literacy Scale.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHDiabetes Mellitus-
dc.subject.MESHEducational Measurement-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice-
dc.subject.MESHHealth Literacy-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPsychometrics-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.titleSelf-administered health literacy instruments for people with diabetes: systematic review of measurement properties-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid28103387-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이, 은현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김, 춘자-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.13256-
dc.citation.titleJournal of advanced nursing-
dc.citation.volume73-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.date2017-
dc.citation.startPage2035-
dc.citation.endPage2048-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of advanced nursing, 73(9). : 2035-2048, 2017-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2648-
dc.relation.journalidJ003092402-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > Graduate School of Public Health > Public Health
Journal Papers > College of Nursing Science / Graduate School of Nursing Sciences > Nursing Science
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse