213 576

Cited 3 times in

Comparison of the paediatric blade of the Pentax-AWS and Ovassapian airway in fibreoptic tracheal intubation in patients with limited mouth opening and cervical spine immobilization by a semi-rigid neck collar: a randomized controlled trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, DH-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, JY-
dc.contributor.authorHa, SY-
dc.contributor.authorChae, YJ-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T01:49:13Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-24T01:49:13Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0007-0912-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/15958-
dc.description.abstractBackground: We compared the performances of the paediatric blade of a Pentax Airway Scope and an Ovassapian airway in fibreoptic tracheal intubation in patients whose necks were stabilized by semi-rigid neck collars.
Methods: Ninety patients were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups (Group OVA-FOB and Group AWS-FOB). The time to tracheal intubation, success rate of tracheal intubation, number of optimization manoeuvres (jaw thrust), and difficulty of manipulation of the fibreoptic bronchoscope were compared between the groups.
Results: The time to tracheal intubation was significantly shorter (32 vs 50 s: median difference 19 s: 95% confidence interval 14-25 s: P<0.001) and manipulation of the fibreoptic bronchoscope was significantly easier for Group AWS-FOB. Optimization manoeuvres were rarely required to facilitate fibreoptic tracheal intubation in Group AWS-FOB [jaw thrust, 0 (0%): jaw thrust with anterior neck collar removal, 1 (2%)] compared with that required in Group OVA-FOB [jaw thrust, 39 (87%): jaw thrust with anterior neck collar removal, 2 (4%)]. There was no significant difference in the success rate of tracheal intubation on the first attempt between groups [Group AWS-FOB, 45 (100%): Group OVA-FOB, 44 (98%)].
Conclusions: Combined use of the paediatric blade of a Pentax Airway Scope and a fibreoptic bronchoscope enabled rapid tracheal intubation, minimizing the use of external manoeuvres of the airway, in patients with limited mouth opening and cervical spine immobilization by semi-rigid neck collars, compared with use of the Ovassapian airway and the fibreoptic bronchoscope.
Clinical trial registration: NCT02827110.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleComparison of the paediatric blade of the Pentax-AWS and Ovassapian airway in fibreoptic tracheal intubation in patients with limited mouth opening and cervical spine immobilization by a semi-rigid neck collar: a randomized controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid28981579-
dc.subject.keywordAirway management-
dc.subject.keywordBronchoscopes-
dc.subject.keywordLaryngoscopes-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김, 대희-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor유, 지영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor채, 윤정-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bja/aex272-
dc.citation.titleBritish journal of anaesthesia-
dc.citation.volume119-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.date2017-
dc.citation.startPage993-
dc.citation.endPage999-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBritish journal of anaesthesia, 119(5). : 993-999, 2017-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-6771-
dc.relation.journalidJ000070912-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine
Files in This Item:
28981579.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse