Cited 0 times in
Clinical Outcomes and FEM Results of ACDF Performed Using H-Beam-Shaped Allospacer Versus Rim-Shaped Allospacer: A Comparative Study
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 김, 상현 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박, 경덕 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-08T10:23:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-08T10:23:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/16483 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The study’s aim was to evaluate radiological outcomes and finite element method (FEM) results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) performed using H-beam-shaped allospacer and compare these with the corresponding findings of ACDF with rim-shaped allospacer.
Methods: From March 2011 to February 2014, 95 patients underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allospacers (H-beam shaped and rim shaped). Thirty-three patients diagnosed with trauma, Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), or combined posterior fusion were excluded from the study. Sixty-two eligible patients were divided into two groups: Group A comprised patients treated with H-beam-shaped allospacer (n=31) and Group B comprised those treated with rim-shaped allospacer (n=31). Clinical outcomes such as neck and arm pain, radiographical fusion rate, and adverse effects were evaluated. In the FEM study, the performance of three types of allospacers varying in shape—H-beam shaped, H-hole shaped, and rim shaped—was assessed: the effectiveness of stress distribution from these allospacers was compared by using the evaluation criteria of (a) compression, (b) shear and (c) torsion, under the same load. Results: Neck and arm pain were reduced by 63% to 73% in both the groups. Fusion rates after one year were 100% and 98% in Groups A and B, respectively. Regarding complications, the rates of breakage and displacement in Group B were 16% and 3%, respectively. Group A showed no adverse effects. The FEM study revealed that H-beam-shaped allospacer showed more effective stress distribution and diversification with respect to compression, shear, and torsion when compared with the rim-shaped allospacer. Conclusion: In ACDF with allospacer, the H-beam-shaped allospacer offered higher stable fusion rates along with lower incidence of complications when compared with the rim-shaped allospacer. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. Introduction 1
2. Materials and Methods 1 3. Results 3 4. Discussion 4 5. Conclusions 6 6. References 12 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | Clinical Outcomes and FEM Results of ACDF Performed Using H-Beam-Shaped Allospacer Versus Rim-Shaped Allospacer: A Comparative Study | - |
dc.title.alternative | 경추부 전방 유합술 수술시 allospacer 모양(H-beam 과 rim) 에 따른 임상적 예후 및 FEM study 에 관한 연구 | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr:9080/dcollection/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000025497 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Finite element method (FEM) study | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Hbeam-shaped allospacer | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Rim-shaped allospacer | - |
dc.description.degree | Master | - |
dc.contributor.department | 대학원 의학과 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 박, 경덕 | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2017 | - |
dc.type.local | Theses | - |
dc.citation.date | 2017 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.