Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Comparison of the planned one- and elective two-stent techniques in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions with or without acute coronary syndrome from the COBIS II Registry

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, MC-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Y-
dc.contributor.authorSun Sim, D-
dc.contributor.authorJoon Hong, Y-
dc.contributor.authorHan Kim, J-
dc.contributor.authorHo Jeong, M-
dc.contributor.authorGwon, HC-
dc.contributor.authorKim, HS-
dc.contributor.authorRha, SW-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, JH-
dc.contributor.authorJang, Y-
dc.contributor.authorTahk, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorSeung, KB-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-13T04:26:46Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-13T04:26:46Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/17483-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impacts of stent techniques on long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DES) for coronary bifurcation lesions in patients with or without acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the impacts of stent techniques for treating coronary bifurcation lesions in patients with and without ACS.
METHODS: This multicenter registry enrolled 2,897 patients undergoing PCI with DES for coronary bifurcation lesions. We investigated the impacts of planned one-stent and elective two-stent techniques in patients with (n = 1,798) and those without (n = 1,099) ACS. Primary endpoint was the incidence of 3-year target-lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization.
RESULTS: The planned one-stent technique reduced TLF rate compared to elective two-stent technique in the ACS cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49: 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.74: P = 0.001), and not in the non-ACS cohort (HR 0.61: 95% CI 0.35-1.06: P = 0.079). After propensity score matching, the planned one-stent technique had a significantly lower TLF rate (HR 0.47: 95% CI 0.29-0.74: P = 0.001) in patients with ACS, and it also showed a trend toward lower TLF rate with the planned one-stent technique in patients without ACS (9.0 vs. 14.5%, HR 0.59: 95% CI 0.32-1.14: P = 0.116).
CONCLUSIONS: Planned one-stenting reduced TLF in patients with ACS and it also might be beneficial in those without ACS for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleComparison of the planned one- and elective two-stent techniques in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions with or without acute coronary syndrome from the COBIS II Registry-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid29573537-
dc.subject.keywordacute coronary syndrome-
dc.subject.keywordcoronary bifurcation-
dc.subject.keywordpercutaneous coronary intervention-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor탁, 승제-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.27551-
dc.citation.titleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions-
dc.citation.volume92-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.date2018-
dc.citation.startPage1050-
dc.citation.endPage1060-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 92(6). : 1050-1060, 2018-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.identifier.eissn1522-726X-
dc.relation.journalidJ015221946-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Cardiology
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse