12 28

Cited 0 times in

10-Year Outcomes of Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Authors
Park, DW; Ahn, JM; Yun, SC; Yoon, YH; Kang, DY; Lee, PH; Lee, SW; Park, SW; Seung, KB; Gwon, HC; Jeong, MH; Jang, Y; Kim, HS; Seong, IW; Park, HS; Ahn, T; Chae, IH; Tahk, SJ; Park, SJ
Citation
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(23 Pt A):2813-2822, 2018
Journal Title
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
ISSN
0735-10971558-3597
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comparative outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease were previously reported. However, data on very long-term (>10 years) outcomes are limited.
OBJECTIVES: The authors compare 10-year outcomes after PCI and CABG for LMCA disease.
METHODS: In this observational study of the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty versus Surgical Revascularization) registry, the authors evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent PCI (n = 1,102) or underwent CABG (n = 1,138) between January 2000 and June 2006. Adverse outcomes (death: a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke: and target-vessel revascularization) were compared with the use of propensity scores and inverse-probability-weighting adjustment. The follow-up was extended to at least 10 years of all patients (median 12.0 years).
RESULTS: In the overall cohort, there was no significant difference in adjusted risks of death and the composite outcome between the groups up to 10 years. The risk of target-vessel revascularization was significantly higher in the PCI group. In the cohort comparing drug-eluting stents and concurrent CABG, the 2 study groups did not differ significantly in the risks of death and the composite outcome at 5 years. However, after 5 years, drug-eluting stents were associated with higher risks of death (hazard ratio: 1.35: 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 1.81) and the composite outcome (hazard ratio: 1.46: 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.94) compared with CABG.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with significant LMCA disease, as compared with CABG, PCI showed similar rates of death and serious composite outcomes, but a higher rate of target-vessel revascularization at 10 years. However, CABG showed lower mortality and serious composite outcome rates compared with PCI with drug-eluting stents after 5 years. (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty versus Surgical Revascularization [MAIN-COMPARE]: NCT02791412).
Keywords
bypass surgerycoronary artery diseasestents
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.012
PMID
30261236
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Cardiology
AJOU Authors
탁, 승제
Files in This Item:
10-Year Outcomes of Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.pdfDownload
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse