Cited 0 times in
Accuracy of the lateral cage placement under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy in oblique lateral interbody fusion
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chung, NS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, HD | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jeon, CH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-13T04:27:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-13T04:27:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0949-2658 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/17604 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: In oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), the lateral cage enters into the disc space obliquely, and is then turned to the true lateral direction to achieve a lateral lumbar interbody fusion. The OLIF cage is sometimes placed asymmetrically although it seemed to be placed accurately on intraoperative C-arm images. The present study aimed to investigate the accuracy of cage placement and its effect on the radiological outcome in OLIF.
METHODS: This study involved a retrospective radiological analysis of 127 lateral cages in 75 consecutive OLIF patients. The cage deviations from the midline and cage obliquity were evaluated using three sets of images: (1) intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy, (2) postoperative standing radiographs, and (3) postoperative computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: The mean cage deviation from the midline was measured as 2.5 +/- 2.7 mm on intraoperative C-arm images, but was found to be more deviated on postoperative radiographs and CT (5.4 +/- 3.8 mm and 3.8 +/- 3.7 mm: P = 0.000 and 0.005, respectively). The cage obliquity on the intraoperative lateral C-arm was minimal in 26 (20.5%) cases, mild in 69 (54.3%), and moderate in 32 (25.2%), but was found to be more obliquely on postoperative radiographs as minimal in 9 (7.1%), mild in 55 (43.3%), and moderate in 63 (49.6%) (P < 0.001). Anterior/posterior disc heights, disc lordotic angle, fusion rate, and cage subsidence rate were not different according to cage obliquity (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cage deviation from the midline and obliquity is underestimated on intraoperative C-arm images in OLIF. Although minimal cage deviation and obliquity did not affect the radiological outcome, great care should be made for the orthogonal cage insertion. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged, 80 and over | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Fluoroscopy | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Internal Fixators | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lumbar Vertebrae | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Spinal Fusion | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Tomography, X-Ray Computed | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Treatment Outcome | - |
dc.title | Accuracy of the lateral cage placement under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy in oblique lateral interbody fusion | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30119930 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 정, 남수 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이, 한동 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 전, 창훈 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jos.2018.07.010 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of orthopaedic science | - |
dc.citation.volume | 23 | - |
dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2018 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 918 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 922 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of orthopaedic science, 23(6). : 918-922, 2018 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1436-2023 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J009492658 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.