Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Comparison Between Early Functional Rehabilitation and Cast Immobilization After Minimally Invasive Repair for an Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorNam, IH-
dc.contributor.authorPark, YU-
dc.contributor.authorCho, JH-
dc.contributor.authorLee, DH-
dc.contributor.authorMin, KJ-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-14T05:17:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-14T05:17:47Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn1067-2516-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/20029-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to compare the outcomes of patients with Achilles tendon rupture treated with minimally invasive repair and early functional rehabilitation with the outcomes of similar patients treated with cast immobilization. After undergoing minimally invasive surgery, a below-knee splint with the foot in 30 degrees of plantarflexion was applied to each patient for the first week. Patients were then assigned to a cast immobilization group (IG; n=25) or a functional group (FG; n=16). Data were collected during outpatient checks at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Outcomes of interest included range of motion (ROM), heel height, calf circumference, pain and functional score, return to work and light sports activity, and complications. The time interval for return to work in the FG was faster than that in the IG (p=.026). There was no clinically important difference between the 2 groups with regard to heel height, ROM, return to sports, calf circumference, visual analog scale, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, or Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score at every outpatient check except ROM difference at 6 weeks and heel height at 3 months. Rerupture occurred in 2 patients (1 [4%] in the IG and 1 [6.25%] in the FG). Early functional rehabilitation seemed to be as safe as traditional postoperative immobilization with a similar functional result and complications, but it was advantageous for the early phase of rehabilitation only.-
dc.subject.MESHAchilles Tendon-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHCasts, Surgical-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHImmobilization-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures-
dc.subject.MESHPhysical Therapy Modalities-
dc.subject.MESHRange of Motion, Articular-
dc.subject.MESHRecovery of Function-
dc.subject.MESHRecurrence-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRupture-
dc.subject.MESHTendon Injuries-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titleComparison Between Early Functional Rehabilitation and Cast Immobilization After Minimally Invasive Repair for an Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid31130480-
dc.subject.keywordAchilles tendon rupture-
dc.subject.keywordearly functional rehabilitation-
dc.subject.keywordminimally invasive repair-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, YU-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, JH-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, DH-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.024-
dc.citation.titleThe Journal of foot and ankle surgery-
dc.citation.volume58-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.date2019-
dc.citation.startPage628-
dc.citation.endPage631-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationThe Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 58(4). : 628-631, 2019-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.identifier.eissn1542-2224-
dc.relation.journalidJ010672516-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Orthopedic Surgery
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse