Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Clinical results of minimally invasive open-heart surgery in patients with mitral valve disease: comparison of parasternal and low-sternal approach.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, S-
dc.contributor.authorChang, BC-
dc.contributor.authorLim, SH-
dc.contributor.authorHong, YS-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, KJ-
dc.contributor.authorKang, MS-
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-06T05:00:10Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-06T05:00:10Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.issn0513-5796-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/2183-
dc.description.abstractClinical results of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery were retrospectively reviewed, and two different surgical approaches were compared in this study. Between 1997 and 2004, a total of 86 patients with mitral valve disease underwent minimally invasive surgery at the Yonsei University Cardiovascular Center. Age of patients averaged 41.6 +/- 14.0 years and 69 patients were female. Surgical approach included low- sternal incisions with mini-sternotomy, and right parasternal or thoracotomy approach. Either direct aortic or femoral arterial and bicaval cannulations were used in all patients. Patients were divided into two groups according to the method of surgical approach (parasternal (P) vs low-sternal (L)), and the results were compared. Postoperative NYHA functional class improved to 1.1 +/- 0.4 in all patients (no significant statistical difference between two groups). Mean wound length (P: 9.21 +/- 1.10 vs L: 11.24 +/- 0.82 cm, p < 0.05), and mechanical ventilation time (P: 10.42 +/- 4.36 vs L: 12.90 +/- 5.00 min, p=0.04) was significantly shorter in parasternal group, and mean operation time(P:294.74 +/- 59.41 vs. L:259.31 +/- 54.36 min, p=0.03) was significantly shorter in low-sternal group. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time, and aortic cross clamp time was also shorter in low-sternal group without statistical difference. There were 2 minor wound complications in all patients (p=NS), and no hospital death. Comparing the two different surgical approach of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, parasternal approach is thought to be more beneficial in reducing postoperative scar, and intubation time.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAdolescent-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHCardiac Surgical Procedures-
dc.subject.MESHCardiopulmonary Bypass-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHeart Valve Prosthesis Implantation-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMitral Valve-
dc.subject.MESHMitral Valve Insufficiency-
dc.subject.MESHModels, Statistical-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSternum-
dc.subject.MESHSurgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.titleClinical results of minimally invasive open-heart surgery in patients with mitral valve disease: comparison of parasternal and low-sternal approach.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid16642553-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687633/-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor임, 상현-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.3349/ymj.2006.47.2.230-
dc.citation.titleYonsei medical journal-
dc.citation.volume47-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.date2006-
dc.citation.startPage230-
dc.citation.endPage236-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationYonsei medical journal, 47(2). : 230-236, 2006-
dc.identifier.eissn1976-2437-
dc.relation.journalidJ005135796-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery
Files in This Item:
16642553.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse