Cited 0 times in
Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cha, YH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoo, JI | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, JT | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, CH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ahn, YS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choy, WS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ha, YC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Koo, KH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-07T05:53:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-07T05:53:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2049-4394 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23202 | - |
dc.description.abstract | AIMS: To evaluate the rate of dislocation following dual mobility total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, and to compare rates of dislocation, surgical-site infection, reoperation, and one-year mortality between DM-THA and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA).
METHODS: Studies were selected based on the following criteria: 1) study design (retrospective cohort studies, prospective cohort studies, retrospective comparative studies, prospective comparative studies, and randomized controlled studies (RCTs)); 2) study population (patients with femoral neck fracture); 3) intervention (DM-THA or BHA); and 4) outcomes (complications during postoperative follow-up and clinical results). Pooled meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the dislocation rate after DM-THA and to compare outcomes between DM-THA and BHA. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies (ten cohort studies on DM-THA and seven comparative studies of DM-THA and BHA) were selected. These studies included 2,793 patients (2,799 hips), made up of 2,263 DM-THA patients (2,269 hips) and 530 BHA patients (530 hips). In all, 16 studies were analyzed to evaluate dislocation rate after DM-THA. The cumulative dislocation rate was 4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3 to 5). Seven studies were analyzed to compare the rates dislocation and surgical-site infection. The rate of dislocation was significantly lower in the DM-THA group than in the BHA group (risk ratio (RR) 0.3; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.53, p < 0.001, Z -4.11). There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical-site infection between the two groups (p = 0.580). Six studies reported all-cause reoperations. The rate of reoperation was significantly lower in the DM-THA group than in the BHA group (RR 0.5; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.78, p = 0.003, Z -3.01). Five studies reported one-year mortality. The mortality rate was significantly lower in the DM-THA group than in the BHA group (RR 0.58 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75, p < 0.0001, Z -4.2). CONCLUSION: While the evidence available consisted mainly of non-randomized studies, DM-THA appeared to be a viable option for patients with displaced fractures of the femoral neck, with better reported rates of dislocation, reoperation, and mortality than BHA. | - |
dc.format | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Femoral Neck Fractures | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Hemiarthroplasty | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Hip Dislocation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Hip Prosthesis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Intra-Articular Fractures | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Prosthesis Design | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Reoperation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Surgical Wound Infection | - |
dc.title | Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33135437 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Dual mobility | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Femoral neck fractures | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Systematic review | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Total hip arthroplasty | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김, 정택 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-0610.R2 | - |
dc.citation.title | The bone & joint journal | - |
dc.citation.volume | 102-B | - |
dc.citation.number | 11 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2020 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1457 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1466 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | The bone & joint journal, 102-B(11). : 1457-1466, 2020 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2049-4408 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J020494394 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.