BACKGROUND: Because type 2 diabetes mellitus is a critical health problem with increasing incidence, prevalence, and complications worldwide, e-health has been widely utilized for management in type 2 diabetes. INTRODUCTION: This scoping review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews on e-health interventions aimed to examine service platforms, program types, outcomes, current status of research activities, research gaps, and the effectiveness of type 2 diabetes self-care management among community-dwelling adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Arksey and O'Malley's method was adopted for this review. The Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE databases were searched from inception until April 2018. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, and charted studies using a piloted charting form. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus, and results were collated, summarized, and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: The final studies (N = 81) related to e-health interventions included systematic reviews/meta-analyses on clinical effectiveness (n = 64), usability (n = 14), and behavioral outcomes (n = 47). The commonest e-health intervention subtypes for type 2 diabetes care were patient monitoring (53/163, 32.5%), treatment adherence (50/163, 30.7%), and diabetes-related advice/education (34/163, 20.9%). Mobile devices were most often used to provide e-health services (57/142, 40.1%), followed by the internet (41/142, 28.9%). The e-health strategy that was effective in controlling blood glucose in type 2 diabetes patients was a multimodal intervention comprising treatment advice or education, treatment adherence or reminder methods, and patient monitoring. Treatment adherence or reminder methods and/or patient monitoring showed behavioral effects, but the usability of e-health interventions was controversial. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that e-health intervention should be complex intervention including treatment advice/education, patient monitoring, and treatment adherence or reminder methods.