Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, CH-
dc.contributor.authorNam, CW-
dc.contributor.authorCho, YK-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, HJ-
dc.contributor.authorKim, KB-
dc.contributor.authorGwon, HC-
dc.contributor.authorKim, HS-
dc.contributor.authorChun, WJ-
dc.contributor.authorHan, SH-
dc.contributor.authorRha, SW-
dc.contributor.authorChae, IH-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, JO-
dc.contributor.authorHeo, JH-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, J-
dc.contributor.authorLim, DS-
dc.contributor.authorPark, JS-
dc.contributor.authorHong, MK-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SY-
dc.contributor.authorCha, KS-
dc.contributor.authorKim, DI-
dc.contributor.authorBae, JW-
dc.contributor.authorChang, K-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, BH-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, SY-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, MH-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, KH-
dc.contributor.authorSong, YB-
dc.contributor.authorHong, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorDoh, JH-
dc.contributor.authorKoo, BK-
dc.contributor.authorHur, SH-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-16T05:44:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-16T05:44:42Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23412-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The optimal side branch (SB) treatment strategy after simple crossover stenting in bifurcation lesions is still controversial. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of a 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone versus with an additional SB–opening procedure in patients with left main (LM) and non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions. Methods: Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a 1-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions including LM were selected from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III registry and divided into the simple crossover–alone group and SB-opening group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization). Results: Among 2,194 patients who underwent the 1-stent strategy, 1,685 (76.8%) patients were treated with simple crossover alone, and 509 (23.2%) patients were treated with an additional SB-opening procedure. Although the baseline SB angiographic disease was more severe in the SB-opening group, the final lumen diameter of the SB was larger. The 5-year observed target lesion failure rate was similar between the 2 groups (7.0% in the simple crossover vs. 6.7% in SB-opening group; hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.48; p = 0.947), even in the subgroup analyses including LM (9.5% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.442) and true bifurcation (5.3% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.362). The results were not changed after an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. There was no difference in the overall and SB-related target lesion revascularization rate in both groups. Conclusions: The long-term clinical outcome of the 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone for coronary bifurcation lesions was acceptable compared to those of additional SB-opening procedures. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry III [COBIS III]; NCT03068494)-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.title5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid36338374-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627822/-
dc.subject.keywordbifurcation disease-
dc.subject.keywordclinical outcome-
dc.subject.keywordpercutaneous coronary intervention-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, SY-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.04.002-
dc.citation.titleJACC. Asia-
dc.citation.volume1-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.date2021-
dc.citation.startPage53-
dc.citation.endPage64-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJACC. Asia, 1(1). : 53-64, 2021-
dc.identifier.eissn2772-3747-
dc.relation.journalidJ027723747-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Cardiology
Files in This Item:
36338374.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse