Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Differential factors for predicting outcomes in left main versus non-left main coronary bifurcation stenting

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorCha, JJ-
dc.contributor.authorHong, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorJoo, HJ-
dc.contributor.authorPark, JH-
dc.contributor.authorYu, CW-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, TH-
dc.contributor.authorKim, HS-
dc.contributor.authorChun, WJ-
dc.contributor.authorHur, SH-
dc.contributor.authorHan, SH-
dc.contributor.authorRha, SW-
dc.contributor.authorChae, IH-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, JO-
dc.contributor.authorHeo, JH-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, J-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, KH-
dc.contributor.authorSong, YB-
dc.contributor.authorGwon, HC-
dc.contributor.authorPark, JS-
dc.contributor.authorHong, MK-
dc.contributor.authorDoh, JH-
dc.contributor.authorCha, KS-
dc.contributor.authorKim, DI-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SY-
dc.contributor.authorChang, K-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, BH-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, SY-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, MH-
dc.contributor.authorNam, CW-
dc.contributor.authorKoo, BK-
dc.contributor.authorLim, DS-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-26T00:39:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-26T00:39:10Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23486-
dc.description.abstractBackground: No large-scale study has compared the clinical and angiographic predictors of cardiovascular events in patients with left main bifurcation (LMB) and non-LMB stenting after second-generation DES implantation. Herein, we investigated differential clinical and angiographic factors for predicting outcomes in LMB versus non-LMB stenting. Methods: A total of 2648 patients with bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation DESs from the retrospective patient cohort were divided into an LMB group (n = 935) and a non-LMB group (n = 1713). The primary outcome was the 7-year incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Results: The incidence of TLF was 9.8%. Those in the LMB group were associated with a higher risk of TLF (14.2% versus 7.5%, p < 0.001) than those in the non-LMB group. Regarding the LMB group, independent predictors of TLF were chronic kidney disease (CKD), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and two-stenting. Regarding the non-LMB group, CKD, reduced LVEF, old age, diabetes, and small diameter of the main vessel stent were independent predictors of TLF. Conclusions: The two-stent strategy could potentially increase TLF for the LMB lesions, and achieving the maximal diameter of the main vessel stent could result in better clinical outcomes for non-LMB lesions.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleDifferential factors for predicting outcomes in left main versus non-left main coronary bifurcation stenting-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid34300190-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306985/-
dc.subject.keywordClinical outcome-
dc.subject.keywordCoronary bifurcation stenting-
dc.subject.keywordDrug-eluting stents-
dc.subject.keywordPredictor-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, SY-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm10143024-
dc.citation.titleJournal of clinical medicine-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.citation.number14-
dc.citation.date2021-
dc.citation.startPage3024-
dc.citation.endPage3024-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of clinical medicine, 10(14). : 3024-3024, 2021-
dc.identifier.eissn2077-0383-
dc.relation.journalidJ020770383-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Cardiology
Files in This Item:
34300190.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse