Cited 0 times in
Total nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap: Focusing on the facial aesthetic subunit principle
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, MJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, JW | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-05T03:03:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-05T03:03:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1748-6815 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23659 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The nasal aesthetic subunit principle has been widely accepted as the standard for nasal reconstruction with forehead flaps. However, in our experience, one's impression of a reconstructed face can easily be represented by the nose's entire appearance rather than a single nasal component. Accordingly, we hypothesized that total nasal reconstruction focusing more on the facial aesthetic subunit principle would be superior to focal nasal subunit partial reconstruction. Here, we investigated the indication range of total nasal reconstruction and analyzed its effectiveness. Between July 2006 and December 2017, 32 patients who underwent total or subtotal nasal reconstruction were recruited. The total nasal reconstruction group (n = 20) was treated according to our modified facial aesthetic unit concept, while the subtotal reconstruction group (n = 16) was treated according to the nasal aesthetic subunit principle. Using retrospective reviews, we compared surgical details and aesthetic, and functional outcomes with visual analog scale scores. In aesthetic evaluation, nose contour (p = 0.009), nasal symmetry (p = 0.001), and nostril shape (p = 0.041) were superior in the total nasal reconstruction group. Satisfaction regarding the nose (p = 0.036) was significantly higher than that regarding the forehead and labial folds in the total group. Regarding function, there were no significant intergroup differences in nasal airflow, snoring, or olfaction. We suggest that total nasal reconstruction is not a strategy to avoid because of its aggressive nature. For selected suitable patients, the use of the total nose reconstruction focusing on our one nose concept can be a successful surgical option, and the reconstructed nose can be visualized as a real part of the face. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Anatomic Landmarks | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Esthetics | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Forehead | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Nose Diseases | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Patient Satisfaction | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Postoperative Complications | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Rhinoplasty | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Surgical Flaps | - |
dc.title | Total nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap: Focusing on the facial aesthetic subunit principle | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33386264 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Aesthetic subunit | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Facial aesthetic subunit | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Nasal reconstruction | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Paramedian forehead flap | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Rhinoplasty | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, MJ | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.023 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 74 | - |
dc.citation.number | 8 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2021 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1824 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1831 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 74(8). : 1824-1831, 2021 | - |
dc.embargo.liftdate | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 9999-12-31 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1878-0539 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J017486815 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.