Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, JH-
dc.contributor.authorChun, YM-
dc.contributor.authorKim, DS-
dc.contributor.authorLee, DH-
dc.contributor.authorShin, SJ-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-05T03:03:42Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-05T03:03:42Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1058-2746-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23753-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters of patients after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) between the Grammont prosthesis and lateralized humeral design prosthesis. Methods: A total of 114 patients who underwent RSA with a lateralized humeral design (group L; 71 shoulders) and medialized humeral design (group M; 43 shoulders) prosthesis for cuff tear arthropathy or irreparable rotator cuff tear were enrolled. Clinical outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Constant scores and range of motion (ROM) were serially followed up at postoperative 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Radiographic parameters were measured to evaluate preoperative and postoperative status. Results: Both prostheses demonstrated similar clinical outcomes and shoulder function preoperatively and at postoperative 2 years (P >.05). However, patients in group M had significantly better postoperative active forward flexion (postoperative 3 months, 115° ± 12° vs. 101° ± 14°; P <.001; 6 months, 125° ± 13° vs. 118° ± 13°; P <.013) and abduction (3 months, 105° ± 12° vs. 98° ± 12°; P = .002); VAS (3 months, 3.1 ± 1.2 vs. 3.7 ± 1.4; P = .031; 6 months, 2.3 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 1.3; P = .038); ASES (3 months, 64.2 ± 7.0 vs. 60.4 ± 9.2; P = .022; 6 months, 70.6 ± 6.0 vs. 66.6 ± 8.1; P = .007); and Constant scores (6 months, 59.6 ± 6.9 vs. 55.7 ± 9.3; P = .020). Group L showed a significantly lower rate of scapular notching than group M (15.5% vs. 41.8%; P < .001). The position of the proximal humerus in group L was more lateralized and less distalized than in group M after RSA. Conclusions: RSA with both the Grammont and lateralized humeral design prostheses provided similar shoulder ROM restoration and functional improvements at a minimum of 2 years. However, patients with a humeral lateralized prosthesis showed slower recovery of shoulder function and ROM up to postoperative 6 months despite a lower incidence of scapular notching.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHArthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHHumerus-
dc.subject.MESHProstheses and Implants-
dc.subject.MESHProsthesis Design-
dc.subject.MESHRange of Motion, Articular-
dc.subject.MESHShoulder-
dc.subject.MESHShoulder Joint-
dc.subject.MESHShoulder Prosthesis-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleEarly restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid33813010-
dc.subject.keywordcuff tear arthroplasty-
dc.subject.keywordGrammont prosthesis-
dc.subject.keywordlateralized humeral design-
dc.subject.keywordLevel III-
dc.subject.keywordRetrospective Cohort Comparison-
dc.subject.keywordReverse shoulder arthroplasty-
dc.subject.keywordrotator cuff tear-
dc.subject.keywordscapular notching-
dc.subject.keywordTreatment Study-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, DH-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.145-
dc.citation.titleJournal of shoulder and elbow surgery-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.date2021-
dc.citation.startPage2533-
dc.citation.endPage2542-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 30(11). : 2533-2542, 2021-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-6500-
dc.relation.journalidJ010582746-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Orthopedic Surgery
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse