Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

A standardized analytics pipeline for reliable and rapid development and validation of prediction models using observational health data

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKhalid, S-
dc.contributor.authorYang, C-
dc.contributor.authorBlacketer, C-
dc.contributor.authorDuarte-Salles, T-
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Bertolín, S-
dc.contributor.authorKim, C-
dc.contributor.authorPark, RW-
dc.contributor.authorPark, J-
dc.contributor.authorSchuemie, MJ-
dc.contributor.authorSena, AG-
dc.contributor.authorSuchard, MA-
dc.contributor.authorYou, SC-
dc.contributor.authorRijnbeek, PR-
dc.contributor.authorReps, JM-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-10T00:39:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-10T00:39:16Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn0169-2607-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/23926-
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: As a response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, several prediction models in the existing literature were rapidly developed, with the aim of providing evidence-based guidance. However, none of these COVID-19 prediction models have been found to be reliable. Models are commonly assessed to have a risk of bias, often due to insufficient reporting, use of non-representative data, and lack of large-scale external validation. In this paper, we present the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) analytics pipeline for patient-level prediction modeling as a standardized approach for rapid yet reliable development and validation of prediction models. We demonstrate how our analytics pipeline and open-source software tools can be used to answer important prediction questions while limiting potential causes of bias (e.g., by validating phenotypes, specifying the target population, performing large-scale external validation, and publicly providing all analytical source code). Methods: We show step-by-step how to implement the analytics pipeline for the question: ‘In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, what is the risk of death 0 to 30 days after hospitalization?’. We develop models using six different machine learning methods in a USA claims database containing over 20,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations and externally validate the models using data containing over 45,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations from South Korea, Spain, and the USA. Results: Our open-source software tools enabled us to efficiently go end-to-end from problem design to reliable Model Development and evaluation. When predicting death in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, AdaBoost, random forest, gradient boosting machine, and decision tree yielded similar or lower internal and external validation discrimination performance compared to L1-regularized logistic regression, whereas the MLP neural network consistently resulted in lower discrimination. L1-regularized logistic regression models were well calibrated. Conclusion: Our results show that following the OHDSI analytics pipeline for patient-level prediction modelling can enable the rapid development towards reliable prediction models. The OHDSI software tools and pipeline are open source and available to researchers from all around the world.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHCOVID-19-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLogistic Models-
dc.subject.MESHMachine Learning-
dc.subject.MESHPandemics-
dc.subject.MESHSARS-CoV-2-
dc.titleA standardized analytics pipeline for reliable and rapid development and validation of prediction models using observational health data-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid34560604-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420135/-
dc.subject.keywordCOVID-19-
dc.subject.keywordData harmonization-
dc.subject.keywordData quality control-
dc.subject.keywordDistributed data network-
dc.subject.keywordMachine learning-
dc.subject.keywordRisk prediction-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, RW-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106394-
dc.citation.titleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine-
dc.citation.volume211-
dc.citation.date2021-
dc.citation.startPage106394-
dc.citation.endPage106394-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationComputer methods and programs in biomedicine, 211. : 106394-106394, 2021-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7565-
dc.relation.journalidJ001692607-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Biomedical Informatics
Files in This Item:
34560604.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse