Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Survival analysis in patients with invasive lobular cancer and invasive ductal cancer according to hormone receptor expression status in the Korean population

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKwon, D-
dc.contributor.authorKo, BK-
dc.contributor.authorJung, SP-
dc.contributor.authorKim, HK-
dc.contributor.authorKim, EK-
dc.contributor.authorJung, YS-
dc.contributor.authorYoun, HJ-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SB-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T06:22:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-13T06:22:56Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/24449-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) cases with those of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) cases in various hormone receptor expression subgroups. METHODS: We compared clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between patients with IDC (n = 95,486) and ILC (n = 3,023). In addition, we analyzed the effects of different hormone receptor expression subgroups on survival. RESULTS: The ILC group had more instances of advanced stage and hormonal receptor positivity than did the IDC group (p < 0.001), but the IDC group had higher histological grade and nuclear grade, as well as higher frequency of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and Ki67 expression than did the ILC group (p < 0.001). The OS and BCSS were not significantly different between the IDC and ILC groups. The 5-year OS of the IDC group was 88.8%, while that of the ILC group was 90.6% (p = 0.113). The 5-year BCSS of the IDC group was 94.8%, while that of the ILC group was 95.0% (p = 0.552). When analyzing each hormone receptor expression subgroup, there were no significant differences in survival between the IDC and ILC groups. However, the estrogen receptor (ER) negative/progesterone receptor (PR) negative subgroup showed differences in survival between the IDC and ILC groups. Moreover, the hazard ratio of ILC in the ER negative/PR negative subgroup was 1.345 (95% confidence interval: 1.012-1.788; p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Hormone receptor expression should be considered when determining prognosis and treatment regimen for IDC and ILC. Researchers should further study the ER negative/PR negative population to identify treatment and prognostic models that will facilitate the development of individualized therapy for these patients, which is needed for good outcomes.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHBreast-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Ductal, Breast-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Lobular-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHReceptors, Estrogen-
dc.subject.MESHReceptors, Progesterone-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Analysis-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Rate-
dc.titleSurvival analysis in patients with invasive lobular cancer and invasive ductal cancer according to hormone receptor expression status in the Korean population-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid35051228-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8775332-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung, YS-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0262709-
dc.citation.titlePloS one-
dc.citation.volume17-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.date2022-
dc.citation.startPagee0262709-
dc.citation.endPagee0262709-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPloS one, 17(1). : e0262709-e0262709, 2022-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.relation.journalidJ019326203-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Surgery
Files in This Item:
35051228.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse