Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Effects of abdominal drawing-in maneuver with or without prior iliopsoas stretching on gluteus maximus activity during prone hip extension

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, KY-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, IC-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, UJ-
dc.contributor.authorJung, SH-
dc.contributor.authorHa, SM-
dc.contributor.authorYim, SY-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-24T06:27:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-24T06:27:09Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/25151-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Prone hip extension (PHE) has been investigated to strengthen the hip joint and back extensor muscles. However, it has not been compared with various PHE exercises in individuals with iliopsoas shortness. OBJECTIVE: This study compared pelvic compensation and hip and back extensor muscle activities in individuals with iliopsoas shortness during prone hip extension (PHE) using the abdominal drawing-in maneuver alone (PHEA) and after iliopsoas stretching (PHEAS). METHODS: Twenty-five individuals with iliopsoas shortness were included in the study. Electromyography was used to investigate bilateral erector spinae (ES) and ipsilateral gluteus maximus (GM), biceps femoris (BF), and semitendinosus (ST) muscles during PHE, PHEA, and PHEAS. Pelvic anterior tilting and rotation angles were measured during each PHE exercise via electromagnetic motion tracking. A modified Thomas test was used to examine the hip extension angle before and after iliopsoas stretching. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to investigate differences in pelvic anterior tilting and rotation angle and in hip and back extensor muscle activities among PHE, PHEA, and PHEAS. The level of statistical significance was set at alpha= 0.01. RESULTS: GM muscle activity was significantly greater with PHEAS, compared to PHE and PHEA (p< 0.01). Bilateral ES and ipsilateral BF and ST muscle activities were significantly reduced with PHEAS, compared to PHE and PHEA (p< 0.01). Anterior pelvic tilting and rotation angles were significantly reduced with PHEAS, compared to PHE and PHEA (p< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PHEAS is recommended to selectively strengthen GM muscles with minimal BF and ST muscle activities and pelvic compensation in individuals with iliopsoas shortness. The abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) after iliopsoas stretching is more efficient than ADIM alone during PHE, especially in individuals with iliopsoas shortness.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHBack Muscles-
dc.subject.MESHButtocks-
dc.subject.MESHElectromyography-
dc.subject.MESHHip-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMuscle, Skeletal-
dc.subject.MESHProne Position-
dc.titleEffects of abdominal drawing-in maneuver with or without prior iliopsoas stretching on gluteus maximus activity during prone hip extension-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid34250929-
dc.subject.keywordGluteus maximus-
dc.subject.keywordIliopsoas stretching-
dc.subject.keywordProne hip extension-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYim, SY-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-200251-
dc.citation.titleJournal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation-
dc.citation.volume35-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.date2022-
dc.citation.startPage331-
dc.citation.endPage339-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, 35(2). : 331-339, 2022-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-6324-
dc.relation.journalidJ010538127-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse