Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Prognostic artificial intelligence model to predict 5 year survival at 1 year after gastric cancer surgery based on nutrition and body morphometry

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChung, H-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLee, IS-
dc.contributor.authorHur, H-
dc.contributor.authorHuh, J-
dc.contributor.authorHan, SU-
dc.contributor.authorKim, KW-
dc.contributor.authorLee, J-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-04T06:41:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-04T06:41:43Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2190-5991-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/25304-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Personalized survival prediction is important in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy based on large datasets with many variables including time-varying factors in nutrition and body morphometry. One year after gastrectomy might be the optimal timing to predict long-term survival because most patients experience significant nutritional change, muscle loss, and postoperative changes in the first year after gastrectomy. We aimed to develop a personalized prognostic artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict 5 year survival at 1 year after gastrectomy. Methods: From a prospectively built gastric surgery registry from a tertiary hospital, 4025 gastric cancer patients (mean age 56.1 ± 10.9, 36.2% females) treated gastrectomy and survived more than a year were selected. Eighty-nine variables including clinical and derived time-varying variables were used as input variables. We proposed a multi-tree extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, an ensemble AI algorithm based on 100 datasets derived from repeated five-fold cross-validation. Internal validation was performed in split datasets (n = 1121) by comparing our proposed model and six other AI algorithms. External validation was performed in 590 patients from other hospitals (mean age 55.9 ± 11.2, 37.3% females). We performed a sensitivity analysis to analyse the effect of the nutritional and fat/muscle indices using a leave-one-out method. Results: In the internal validation, our proposed model showed AUROC of 0.8237, which outperformed the other AI algorithms (0.7988–0.8165), 80.00% sensitivity, 72.34% specificity, and 76.17% balanced accuracy. In the external validation, our model showed AUROC of 0.8903, 86.96% sensitivity, 74.60% specificity, and 80.78% balanced accuracy. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the nutritional and fat/muscle indices influenced the balanced accuracy by 0.31% and 6.29% in the internal and external validation set, respectively. Our developed AI model was published on a website for personalized survival prediction. Conclusions: Our proposed AI model provides substantially good performance in predicting 5 year survival at 1 year after gastric cancer surgery. The nutritional and fat/muscle indices contributed to increase the prediction performance of our AI model.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAlgorithms-
dc.subject.MESHArtificial Intelligence-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGastrectomy-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms-
dc.titlePrognostic artificial intelligence model to predict 5 year survival at 1 year after gastric cancer surgery based on nutrition and body morphometry-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid36775841-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067496-
dc.subject.keywordArtificial intelligence-
dc.subject.keywordGastric cancer-
dc.subject.keywordPrediction-
dc.subject.keywordPrognosis-
dc.subject.keywordSurvival-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHur, H-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHuh, J-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, SU-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jcsm.13176-
dc.citation.titleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle-
dc.citation.volume14-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.date2023-
dc.citation.startPage847-
dc.citation.endPage859-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 14(2). : 847-859, 2023-
dc.identifier.eissn2190-6009-
dc.relation.journalidJ021905991-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Surgery
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Radiology
Files in This Item:
36775841.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse