Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Comparison between three types of needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid masses: a multicenter observational study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYang, MJ-
dc.contributor.authorKim, J-
dc.contributor.authorPark, SW-
dc.contributor.authorCho, JH-
dc.contributor.authorKim, EJ-
dc.contributor.authorLee, YN-
dc.contributor.authorLee, DW-
dc.contributor.authorPark, CH-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SS-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-04T06:41:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-04T06:41:47Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/25320-
dc.description.abstractIt is debatable which needle has clear superiority of diagnostic performance in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) of solid pancreatic masses. This study aimed to compare the performance of three needles and determine the variables that affect diagnostic accuracy. From March 2014 to May 2020, 746 patients with solid pancreatic masses who underwent EUS-FNB using three types of needles (Franseen needle, Menghini-tip needle, and Reverse-bevel needle) were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model was used to identify factors related to diagnostic accuracy. There were significant differences between the groups regarding the procurement rate of the histologic and optimal quality cores (Franseen vs. Menghini-tip vs. Reverse-bevel: 98.0% [192/196] vs. 85.8% [97/113] vs. 91.9% [331/360], P < 0.001 and 95.4% [187/196] vs. 65.5% [74/113] vs. 88.3% [318/360], P < 0.001, respectively). The sensitivity and accuracy using histologic samples were 95.03% and 95.92% for Franseen, 82.67% and 88.50% for Menghini-tip, and 82.61% and 85.56% for Reverse-bevel needles, respectively. In direct comparison between the needles using histologic samples, the Franseen needle showed significantly superior accuracy than the Menghini-tip (P = 0.018) and Reverse-bevel needles (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor size ≥ 2 cm (odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.40–8.47, P < 0.001) and fanning technique (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00–2.86, P = 0.047) were significantly associated with an accurate diagnosis. EUS-FNB using the Franseen needle enables the acquisition of a larger and more adequate histologic core tissue and achieves an accurate histological diagnosis when using the fanning technique.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHBiopsy, Fine-Needle-
dc.subject.MESHEndosonography-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHNeedles-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography, Interventional-
dc.titleComparison between three types of needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid masses: a multicenter observational study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid36871105-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985625-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYang, MJ-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-023-30920-5-
dc.citation.titleScientific reports-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.date2023-
dc.citation.startPage3677-
dc.citation.endPage3677-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationScientific reports, 13(1). : 3677-3677, 2023-
dc.identifier.eissn2045-2322-
dc.relation.journalidJ020452322-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Gastroenterology
Files in This Item:
36871105.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse