Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Korean practice guidelines for gastric cancer 2022: An evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach

Authors
Kim, TH | Kim, IH | Kang, SJ | Choi, M | Kim, BH | Eom, BW | Kim, BJ | Min, BH | Choi, CI | Shin, CM | Tae, CH | Gong, CS | Kim, DJ | Cho, AE | Gong, EJ | Song, GJ | Im, HS | Ahn, HS | Lim, H | Kim, HD | Kim, JJ | Yu, JI | Lee, JW | Park, JY | Kim, JH | Song, KD | Jung, M | Jung, MR | Son, SY  | Park, SH | Kim, SJ | Lee, SH | Kim, TY | Bae, WK | Koom, WS | Jee, Y | Kim, YM | Kwak, Y | Park, YS | Han, HS | Nam, SY | Kong, SH | Development Working Groups for the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022 Task Force Team
Citation
Journal of gastric cancer, 23(1). : 3-106, 2023
Journal Title
Journal of gastric cancer
ISSN
2093-582X2093-5641
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.
Keywords

DOI
10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11
PMID
36750993
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Surgery
Ajou Authors
손, 상용
Full Text Link
Files in This Item:
36750993.pdfDownload
Export

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse