Cited 0 times in
Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry.
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, DW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seung, KB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, YH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, JY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, WJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, SW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, CW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, SW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yun, SC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gwon, HC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jeong, MH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jang, YS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, HS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, PJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seong, IW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, HS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ahn, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chae, IH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tahk, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, WS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, SJ | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-13T05:47:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-13T05:47:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0735-1097 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/2588 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: We performed the long-term follow-up of a large cohort of patients in a multicenter study receiving left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization.
BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent coronary stent procedure or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who received coronary stents (n = 1,102; 318 with bare-metal stents and 784 with drug-eluting stents) or underwent CABG (n = 1,138) between 2000 and 2006 and for whom complete follow-up data were available for at least 3 to 9 years (median 5.2 years). The 5-year adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke; and target vessel revascularization [TVR]) were compared with the use of the inverse probability of treatment weighted method and propensity-score matching. RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors with the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.44, p = 0.35) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.37, p = 0.59) were not significantly different for patients undergoing stenting versus CABG. The risk of TVR was significantly higher in the stenting group than in the CABG group (HR: 5.11; 95% CI: 3.52 to 7.42, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in comparisons of bare-metal stent with concurrent CABG and of drug-eluting stent with concurrent CABG. In further analysis with propensity-score matching, overall findings were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: During 5-year follow-up, stenting showed similar rates of mortality and of the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke but higher rates of TVR as compared with CABG for patients with unprotected LMCA disease. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Artery Bypass | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Coronary Disease | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Drug-Eluting Stents | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Follow-Up Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Stents | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Treatment Outcome | - |
dc.title | Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry. | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20451344 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735-1097(10)01383-5 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 탁, 승제 | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.004 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology | - |
dc.citation.volume | 56 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2010 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 117 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 124 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 56(2). : 117-124, 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1558-3597 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J007351097 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.