Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Effectiveness of Self-Assessment, TAilored Information, and Lifestyle Management for Cancer Patients' Returning to Work (START): A Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKang, D-
dc.contributor.authorBae, KR-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Y-
dc.contributor.authorKim, N-
dc.contributor.authorNam, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorLee, JE-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SK-
dc.contributor.authorShim, YM-
dc.contributor.authorSinn, DH-
dc.contributor.authorOh, SY-
dc.contributor.authorChun, M-
dc.contributor.authorHeo, J-
dc.contributor.authorCho, J-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T02:52:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-14T02:52:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1598-2998-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/25968-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: We developed a comprehensive return to work (RTW) intervention covering physical, psycho-social and practical issues for patients newly diagnosed and evaluated its efficacy in terms of RTW. Materials and Methods: A multi-center randomized controlled trial was done to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention conducted at two university-based cancer centers in Korea. The intervention program comprised educational material at diagnosis, a face-to-face educational session at completion of active treatment, and three individualized telephone counseling sessions. The control group received other education at enrollment. RESULTS: At 1-month post-intervention (T2), the intervention group was more likely to be working compared to the control group after controlling working status at diagnosis (65.4% vs. 55.9%, p=0.037). Among patients who did not work at baseline, the intervention group was 1.99-times more likely to be working at T2. The mean of knowledge score was higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (7.4 vs. 6.8, p=0.029). At the 1-year follow-up, the intervention group was 65% (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 3.48) more likely to have higher odds for having work. CONCLUSION: The intervention improved work-related knowledge and was effective in facilitating cancer patients' RTW.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLife Style-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasms-
dc.subject.MESHSelf-Assessment-
dc.titleEffectiveness of Self-Assessment, TAilored Information, and Lifestyle Management for Cancer Patients' Returning to Work (START): A Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid36397237-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101798-
dc.subject.keywordCancer survivors-
dc.subject.keywordEducation-
dc.subject.keywordRandomized controlled trials-
dc.subject.keywordReturn to work-
dc.subject.keywordStigma-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorOh, SY-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChun, M-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHeo, J-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.4143/crt.2022.939-
dc.citation.titleCancer research and treatment-
dc.citation.volume55-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.date2023-
dc.citation.startPage419-
dc.citation.endPage428-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCancer research and treatment, 55(2). : 419-428, 2023-
dc.identifier.eissn2005-9256-
dc.relation.journalidJ015982998-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Surgery
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Radiation Oncology
Files in This Item:
36397237.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse