Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Expert opinion on evidence after the 2020 Korean Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines: a secondary publication

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChung, SP-
dc.contributor.authorSohn, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLee, J-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Y-
dc.contributor.authorCha, KC-
dc.contributor.authorHeo, JS-
dc.contributor.authorKim, AE-
dc.contributor.authorKim, JG-
dc.contributor.authorKim, HS-
dc.contributor.authorShin, H-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, C-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, HG-
dc.contributor.authorLee, BK-
dc.contributor.authorJang, YS-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, YH-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, SO-
dc.contributor.authorGuideline Committee of the Korean Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (KACPR)-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T04:55:04Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-19T04:55:04Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/32251-
dc.description.abstractConsiderable evidence has been published since the 2020 Korean Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines were reported. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) also publishes the Consensus on CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) summary annually. This review provides expert opinions by re-viewing the recent evidence on CPR and ILCOR treatment recommendations. The authors reviewed the CoSTR summary published by ILCOR in 2021 and 2022. PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions for each topic were reviewed using a systemic or scoping review methodology. Two experts were appointed for each question and reviewed the topic inde-pendently. Topics suggested by the reviewers for revision or additional description of the guidelines were discussed at a consensus conference. Forty-three questions were reviewed, including 15 on basic life support, seven on advanced life support, two on pediatric life support, 11 on neonatal life support, six on education and teams, one on first aid, and one related to COVID-19. Fi-nally, the current Korean CPR Guideline was maintained for 28 questions, and expert opinions were suggested for 15 questions.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleExpert opinion on evidence after the 2020 Korean Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines: a secondary publication-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid37620035-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10790069-
dc.subject.keywordCardiopulmonary resuscitation-
dc.subject.keywordExpert opinion-
dc.subject.keywordHeart arrest-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, J-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.15441/ceem.23.102-
dc.citation.titleClinical and experimental emergency medicine-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.date2023-
dc.citation.startPage382-
dc.citation.endPage392-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationClinical and experimental emergency medicine, 10(4). : 382-392, 2023-
dc.identifier.eissn2383-4625-
dc.relation.journalidJ023834625-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Emergency Medicine
Files in This Item:
37620035.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse