Cited 0 times in
Handheld ultrasound-assisted versus palpation-guided combined spinal-epidural for labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bae, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoo, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, JT | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, SK | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-19T04:55:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-19T04:55:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/32260 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Preprocedural ultrasound assistance can enhance the efficacy of neuraxial anesthesia in obstetrics. We investigated whether the use of handheld ultrasound can shorten the procedural time of labor combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia compared with conventional landmark-guided methods. Eighty-four women requesting labor analgesia were randomly assigned to either handheld ultrasound-assisted or palpation-guided CSE analgesia. Primary outcome was procedure time of the CSE analgesia. Secondary outcomes included identification time, performance time, number of needle manipulations required for epidural/spinal success, first-attempt success rate, periprocedural pain scores, the incidence of accidental dural puncture, and patient satisfaction. Total procedure time did not significantly differ between the ultrasound and palpation groups (median [IQR], 191.5 [167–224] vs. 204.5 [163–358] s; P = 0.442). However, the performance time was significantly shorter in the ultrasound group (134.5 [115–177] vs. 183 [129–296] s; P = 0.011), although identification time was longer in the ultrasound group (53 [41–72] vs. 30.5 [21–45] s; P < 0.001). The epidural success rate at first insertion attempt was higher in the ultrasound group (85.7% vs. 59.5%, P = 0.014). Preprocedural handheld ultrasound assistance resulted in equivalent total procedure times but reduced performance times and higher first-attempt success rates. Therefore, clinicians may consider this technique for labor CSE analgesia. Trial registration: NCT04759547. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Analgesia, Epidural | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Anesthesia, Spinal | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Palpation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pregnancy | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Spinal Puncture | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Ultrasonography, Interventional | - |
dc.title | Handheld ultrasound-assisted versus palpation-guided combined spinal-epidural for labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38155223 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10754906 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Bae, J | - |
dc.type.local | Journal Papers | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41598-023-50407-7 | - |
dc.citation.title | Scientific reports | - |
dc.citation.volume | 13 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.date | 2023 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 23009 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 23009 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Scientific reports, 13(1). : 23009-23009, 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2045-2322 | - |
dc.relation.journalid | J020452322 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.