Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Challenges and potential improvements in the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) derived through meta-evaluation: a cross-sectional study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLee, MJ-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, J-
dc.contributor.authorHa, C-
dc.contributor.authorKang, YJ-
dc.contributor.authorJung, CW-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, DM-
dc.contributor.authorYu, J-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SH-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-19T07:07:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-19T07:07:03Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/32538-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: This study aimed to identify challenges and potential improvements in Korea's medical education accreditation process according to the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019). Meta-evaluation was conducted to survey the experiences and perceptions of stakeholders, including self-assessment committee members, site visit committee members, administrative staff, and medical professors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using surveys sent to 40 medical schools. The 332 participants included self-assessment committee members, site visit team members, administrative staff, and medical school professors. The t-test, one-way analysis of variance and the chi-square test were used to analyze and compare opinions on medical education accreditation between the categories of participants. RESULTS: Site visit committee members placed greater importance on the necessity of accreditation than faculty members. A shared positive view on accreditation's role in improving educational quality was seen among self-evaluation committee members and professors. Administrative staff highly regarded the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation's reliability and objectivity, unlike the self-evaluation committee members. Site visit evaluators positively perceived the clarity of accreditation standards, differing from self-assessment committee members. Administrative staff were most optimistic about implementing standards. However, the accreditation process encountered challenges, especially in duplicating content and preparing self-evaluation reports. Finally, perceptions regarding the accuracy of final site visit reports varied significantly between the self-evaluation committee members and the site visit committee members. CONCLUSION: This study revealed diverse views on medical education accreditation, highlighting the need for improved communication, expectation alignment, and stakeholder collaboration to refine the accreditation process and quality.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAccreditation-
dc.subject.MESHCross-Sectional Studies-
dc.subject.MESHEducation, Medical-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.titleChallenges and potential improvements in the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) derived through meta-evaluation: a cross-sectional study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid38561017-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11108703-
dc.subject.keywordCross-sectional study-
dc.subject.keywordMedical education accreditation-
dc.subject.keywordMeta-evaluation-
dc.subject.keywordQuality improvement-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYu, J-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.8-
dc.citation.titleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions-
dc.citation.volume21-
dc.citation.date2024-
dc.citation.startPage8-
dc.citation.endPage8-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of educational evaluation for health professions, 21. : 8-8, 2024-
dc.identifier.eissn1975-5937-
dc.relation.journalidJ019755937-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Office of Medical Education
Files in This Item:
38561017.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse