The Efficacy of Intraosseous Access for Initial Resuscitation in Patients with Severe Trauma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in South Korea

Abstract

Background/Objective: In patients with severe trauma, intraosseous (IO) access is an alternative when intravenous (IV) access proves challenging. However, detailed insights into its utilization patterns and effectiveness are lacking. This study aims to evaluate the use and efficacy of IO access in hemodynamically unstable patients with trauma at level-1 trauma centers in South Korea. Methods: Data from six centers over 12 months were analyzed, focusing on patients with traumatic cardiac arrest or shock. Overall, 206 patients were included in the study: 94 in the IO group and 112 in the IV group. Results: The first-attempt success rate was higher in the IO group than in the IV group (90.4% vs. 75.5%). The procedure time in the IO group was also shorter than that in the IV group. The fluid infusion rate was lower in the IO group than in the IV group; however, the use of a pressure bag with IO access significantly increased the rate, making it comparable to the IV infusion rate. Further, regarding IO access, a humeral site provided a higher infusion rate than a tibial site. Conclusions: IO access offers a viable alternative to IV access for the initial resuscitation in patients with trauma, providing advantages in terms of procedure time and first-attempt success rate. The use of a pressure bag and a humeral site for IO access afforded infusion rates comparable to those associated with IV access.