Widespread Use of Imaging-Guided PCI in Asia: Time for Extended Application
Authors
Kim, Y | Kim, JH | Hong, SJ | Kim, HK | Lee, HJ | Yoon, HJ | Cho, DK | Kim, JS | Lee, BK | Heo, JH | Park, DW | Choi, SY
 | Hong, YJ | Doh, JH | Park, KW | Nam, CW | Hahn, JY | Koo, BK | Kim, BK | Hur, SH
In recent years, a wealth of clinical data has emerged regarding intravascular imaging involving either intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography. This surge in data has propelled the adoption of intravascular imaging–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in daily clinical practice. The findings of current randomized clinical trials regarding imaging guidance have lent strong support to the benefits of intravascular imaging–guided PCI. This holds especially true for the diagnosis and treatment of complex lesions, such as left main disease, diffuse long lesions, chronic total occlusion, severely calcified lesions, bifurcations, and in-stent restenosis, as well as in high-risk patients such as those with acute myocardial infarction or chronic kidney disease. During intravascular imaging–guided PCI, operators attempt to achieve stent optimization for maximized benefits of imaging guidance. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the updated clinical data of intravascular imaging–guided PCI and intravascular ultrasound/optical coherence tomography–derived stent optimization criteria.