Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Survival Outcomes Based on Axillary Surgery in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Nationwide Study From the Korean Breast Cancer Society

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, BK-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, J-
dc.contributor.authorLee, J-
dc.contributor.authorKang, E-
dc.contributor.authorBaek, SY-
dc.contributor.authorLee, S-
dc.contributor.authorLee, HJ-
dc.contributor.authorLee, J-
dc.contributor.authorSun, WY-
dc.contributor.authorKorean Breast Cancer, S-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-11T07:49:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-11T07:49:38Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn1738-6756-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/32884-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In total mastectomy (TM), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended but can be omitted for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, concerns regarding SLNB-related complications and their impact on quality of life exist. Consequently, further research is required to evaluate the role of axillary surgeries, including SLNB, in the treatment of TM. We aimed to explore the clinicopathological factors and outcomes associated with axillary surgery in patients with a final diagnosis of pure DCIS who underwent BCS or TM. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed large-scale data from the Korean Breast Cancer Society registration database, highlighting on patients diagnosed with pure DCIS who underwent surgery and were categorized into two groups: BCS and TM. Patients were further categorized into surgery and non-surgery groups according to their axillary surgery status. The analysis compared clinicopathological factors and outcomes according to axillary surgery status between the BCS and TM groups. Results: Among 18,196 patients who underwent surgery for DCIS between 1981 and 2022, 11,872 underwent BCS and 6,324 underwent TM. Both groups leaned towards axillary surgery more frequently for large tumors. In the BCS group, clinical lymph node status was associated with axillary surgery (odds ratio, 11.101; p = 0.003). However, in the TM group, no significant differences in these factors were observed. Survival rates did not vary between groups according to axillary surgery performance. Conclusion: The decision to perform axillary surgery in patients with a final diagnosis of pure DCIS does not affect the prognosis, regardless of the breast surgical method. Furthermore, regardless of the breast surgical method, axillary surgery, including SLNB, should be considered for high-risk patients, such as those with large tumors. This may reduce unnecessary axillary surgery and enhance the patients’ quality of life.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleSurvival Outcomes Based on Axillary Surgery in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Nationwide Study From the Korean Breast Cancer Society-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid38433090-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912575-
dc.subject.keywordCarcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating-
dc.subject.keywordMastectomy-
dc.subject.keywordSentinel Lymph Node-
dc.subject.keywordSurvival-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorBaek, SY-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.4048/jbc.2023.0221-
dc.citation.titleJournal of breast cancer-
dc.citation.volume27-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.date2024-
dc.citation.startPage1-
dc.citation.endPage13-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of breast cancer, 27(1). : 1-13, 2024-
dc.identifier.eissn2092-9900-
dc.relation.journalidJ017386756-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Surgery
Files in This Item:
38433090.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse