Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Is postoperative radiotherapy useful for the rectal carcinoma in the era of total mesorectal excision?

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSuh, KW-
dc.contributor.authorKim, BW-
dc.contributor.authorChun, M-
dc.contributor.authorLim, HY-
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-22-
dc.date.available2011-07-22-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.issn0172-6390-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/3509-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND/AIMS: The exact role of postoperative radiotherapy following curative surgery of rectal carcinoma has been debated. In this retrospective study, we examined the effect of radiotherapy on the survival and recurrence rate of rectal cancer patients who underwent total mesorectal excision.



METHODOLOGY: Since June 1994, stage II and III rectal cancer patients have been recommended to receive postoperative chemoradiation. Among 175 consecutive patients who had undergone total mesorectal excision, 120 completed postoperative chemoradiation (group A) and 55 patients declined to receive radiation therapy (group B). For the two groups, survival and recurrence rates were compared. Mean follow-up time was 24.7 months. There was no difference between two groups with regard to sex, mean age, stage of the disease, mean tumor height, type of operation and mean follow-up duration.



RESULTS: Overall recurrence rate showed no difference between the two groups (24.0% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.28). Local recurrence rate was also similar (10.0% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.11). There was no significant difference in duration to initial recurrence (14.0 months vs. 11.0 months, P = 0.18). The 5-year disease-free survival was 57% in group A and 63% in group B (P = 0.33). Disease-free survival in stage II was significantly better than in stage III. (78% vs. 42% overall, 70% vs. 37% in group A, 92% vs. 44% for group B, P < 0.01).



CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found no beneficial effect of postoperative radiation therapy following total mesorectal excision for the rectal cancer. So far, the prognosis was critically dependent on the stage rather than presence or absence of radiotherapy after total mesorectal excision.
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAntimetabolites, Antineoplastic-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFluorouracil-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLeucovorin-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Period-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHRadiotherapy, Adjuvant-
dc.subject.MESHRectal Neoplasms-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleIs postoperative radiotherapy useful for the rectal carcinoma in the era of total mesorectal excision?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid11995460-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor서, 광욱-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor전, 미선-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor임, 호영-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.citation.titleHepato-gastroenterology-
dc.citation.volume49-
dc.citation.number44-
dc.citation.date2002-
dc.citation.startPage399-
dc.citation.endPage403-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHepato-gastroenterology, 49(44). : 399-403, 2002-
dc.relation.journalidJ001726390-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Surgery
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Radiation Oncology
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Hematology-Oncology
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse