127 385

Cited 0 times in

A Comparative Analysis of Two Historical Approaches to the Formation of the Modern Clinical Medicine

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이, 종찬-
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-16T02:21:40Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-16T02:21:40Z-
dc.date.issued1994-
dc.identifier.issn1225-505X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/6172-
dc.description.abstractFrom the perspective of research methodology, it may be said to exist two kinds of different historical approaches with regards to the formation of modern clinical medicine at the turn of the nineteenth century. One is to explain this in terms of the agency or structure that is associated with research topic. This historical view assumes that the Western scientific rationalism is characterized by the unity of Western tradition and its evolution as continuity. Its main foucs is given either on how French revolution and war affected the growth of clinical medicine and the hospital reform movement or on how Paris Clinical School contributed to the birth of modern clinical medicine. The other is, according to Michel Foucault, to analyze how medical discourses are related to social(institutional) practices. Following Canguilhem’s history of concepts, Foucault traces the historical development of the concept of disease. Elizabeth A. Williams, another proponent of this method, conceptualizes the eighteenth-century medicine as three different medical discourses - anthropology, physiology and philosophical medicine, and analyzes how their structural fragmentation were transformed into the modern establishment of clinical medicine in the nineteenth century. In conclusion, first, the historical research may be compatible with epistemological investigation of modern clinical medicine. Second, the modernity of Western medicine can not be fully clarified without understanding the reciprocal relationships between hygienic medicine and clinical medicine.-
dc.formattext/plain-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of Two Historical Approaches to the Formation of the Modern Clinical Medicine-
dc.title.alternative근대 임상의학의 형성에 관한 두 가지 다른 역사적 해석-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://kmbase.medric.or.kr/Main.aspx?d=KMBASE&m=VIEW&i=0389219940030020193-
dc.subject.keywordFrench Revolution-
dc.subject.keywordModernity-
dc.subject.keywordClinical Medicine-
dc.subject.keywordAgency-
dc.subject.keywordStructure-
dc.subject.keywordDicourses-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이, 종찬-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.citation.titleUi sahak-
dc.citation.titleKorean journal of medical history-
dc.citation.title의사학-
dc.citation.volume3-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.date1994-
dc.citation.startPage193-
dc.citation.endPage207-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationUi sahak, 3(2):193-207, 1994-
dc.identifier.eissn2093-5609-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Medical Humanities & Social Medicine
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse