Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

A Hybrid Bayesian Network Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Prognosis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChoi, JP-
dc.contributor.authorHan, TH-
dc.contributor.authorPark, RW-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-27T04:25:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-27T04:25:14Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn1225-8903-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/9101-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers affecting women. Both physicians and patients have concerned about breast cancer survivability. Many researchers have studied the breast cancer survivability applying artificial nerural network model (ANN). Usually ANN model outperformed in classification of breast cancer survivability than other models such as logistic regression, Bayesian network (BN), or decision tree models. However, physicians in the fields hesitate to use ANN model, because ANN is a black-box model, and hard to explain the classification result to patients. In this study, we proposed a hybrid model with a degree of the accuracy and interpretation by combining the ANN for accuracy and BN for interpretation.
Methods: We developed an artificial neural network, a Bayesian network, and a hybrid Bayesian network model to predict breast cancer prognosis. The hybrid model combined the artificial neural network and the Bayesian network to obtain a good estimation of prognosis as well as a good explanation of the results. The National Cancer Institute’s SEER program public-use data (1973-2003) were used to construct and evaluate the proposed models. Nine variables, which are clinically acceptable, were selected for input to the proposed models’ nodes. A confidence value of the neural network served as an additional input node to the hybrid Bayesian network model. Ten iterations of random subsampling were performed to evaluate performance of the models.
Results: The hybrid BN model achieved the highest area under the curve value of 0.935, whereas the corresponding values of the neural network and Bayesian network were 0.930 and 0.813, respectively. The neural network model achieved the highest prediction accuracy of 88.8% with a sensitivity of 93.7% and a specificity of 85.4%. The hybrid Bayesian network model achieved a prediction accuracy of 87.2% with a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 83.1%. The results of the hybrid Bayesian network model were very similar to the neural network model.
Conclusion: In the experiments, the hybrid model and the ANN model outperformed the Bayesian network model. The proposed hybrid BN model for breast cancer prognosis predictin may be useful for clinicians in the medical fields, as the model provides both high degree of performance inherited from ANN and good explanation power from BN.
en
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleA Hybrid Bayesian Network Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Prognosis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.subject.keywordBayesian Network-
dc.subject.keywordNeural Network-
dc.subject.keywordPrognosis-
dc.subject.keywordBreast Cancer-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한, 태화-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박, 래웅-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.4258/jksmi.2009.15.1.49-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics-
dc.citation.volume15-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.date2009-
dc.citation.startPage49-
dc.citation.endPage57-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics, 15(1). : 49-57, 2009-
dc.relation.journalidJ012258903-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Biomedical Informatics
Files in This Item:
10.4258_jksmi.2009.15.1.49.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse