Cited 0 times in Scipus Cited Count

Development of an Emergency Abdominal Ultrasound Course in Korea: 1-Year Experience

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김, 정수-
dc.contributor.author조, 영순-
dc.contributor.author김, 영식-
dc.contributor.author하, 영록-
dc.contributor.author강, 보승-
dc.contributor.author정, 현수-
dc.contributor.author박, 유석-
dc.contributor.author안, 정환-
dc.contributor.author도, 한호-
dc.contributor.author홍, 훈표-
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-12T04:19:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-02-12T04:19:19Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn1226-4334-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/9303-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This report describes our 1-year experience with an emergency abdominal ultrasound course that we developed for emergency medicine residents and physicians.
Methods: The five-hour course consisted of didactic lectures and hands-on practice. A 1-hour didactic lecture was provided. The lecture consisted of basic ultrasound physics and principles, and anatomy for abdominal ultrasound. In the hands-on session, the instructors demonstrated the abdominal ultrasound techniques and then the students practiced on standard patients. Participants evaluated the programs using a five or ten point Likert scale. After two months to one year, the participants evaluated the usefulness of the course, their knowledge, and their self confidence.
Results: A total of 61 trainees participated in eight courses. The evaluation scores for overall quality of content, clinical utility, quality of educational method, quality of instructor, and time allocation were 4.4±0.7, 4.5±0.6, 4.3±0.6, 4.4±0.6, 4.1±0.7, respectively. Score of self-confidence of each scan before and after the course were as follows: liver scan, 3.2±2.1 to 6.9±1.2; gallbladder and bile duct scan 3.0±2.5 to 6.9±1.2; pancreas scan, 2.4±2.1 to 6.3±1.3; renal scan, 3.6±2.6 to 7.6±1.3. Evaluation scores were followed up after two months to one year to estimate self confidence of each scan. Results were as follows: liver scan, 6.1±1.5; gallbladder and bile duct scan, 6.5±1.6; pancreas scan, 5.5±1.8; renal scan, 7.2±1.5.
Conclusion: The Emergency Abdominal Ultrasound Course is a fairly successful course. But continuous improvement of educational content, and development of an objective evaluation tool need to be done.
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.titleDevelopment of an Emergency Abdominal Ultrasound Course in Korea: 1-Year Experience-
dc.title.alternative응급초음파코스-복부과정의 개발과 1년의 경험-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.subject.keywordUltrasonography-
dc.subject.keywordEducation-
dc.subject.keywordRepublic of Korea-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor안, 정환-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.citation.titleJournal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine-
dc.citation.volume21-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.date2010-
dc.citation.startPage382-
dc.citation.endPage387-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, 21(3). : 382-387, 2010-
dc.identifier.eissn2384-048X-
dc.relation.journalidJ012264334-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Emergency Medicine
Files in This Item:
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine_21(3)_382-387.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse