<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-21T15:18:34Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:repository.ajou.ac.kr:201003/8655" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://repository.ajou.ac.kr/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:repository.ajou.ac.kr:201003/8655</identifier><datestamp>2024-10-11T02:21:20Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_201003_14369</setSpec><setSpec>com_201003_14368</setSpec><setSpec>col_201003_14370</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Comparison of the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting Between women undergoing open or robot-assisted thyroidectomy</dc:title>
<dc:title>여성 환자에서 고전적 갑상선 절제술과 로봇-내시경적 갑상선 절제술 후 오심 구토 발생 빈도 비교</dc:title>
<dc:creator>이, 아람</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>이, 숙영</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>대학원 의학과</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>107323</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>이, 아람</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>Robotic·Open thyroidectomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postoperative nausea and vomiting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>로봇 갑상선 절제술</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>고전적 갑상선 절제술</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>수술 후 오심</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>구토</dc:subject>
<dc:description>BACKGROUND: Open thyroidectomy is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) of up to 70 %. Use of the recently introduced robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy using a gasless transaxillary approach has been increasing because of its several advantages over open thyroidectomy. This study compared the incidence of PONV in the womenwho underwent open or robot-assisted thyroidectomy. 
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, double-blinded study enrolled 170 women 20-60 years of age who were scheduled for conventional open thyroidectomy (Group O) or robot-assisted thyroidectomy (Group R). A standard anesthetic technique, including sevoflurane and air in oxygen, was used. During 0-24 postoperative periods, the presence and severity of PONV (nausea, retching/vomiting), severity of pain, need for rescue antiemetics and the incidence ‘satisfied’ patient were evaluated. 
RESULTS: During 0-6 hpostoperative periods, the incidence of PONV and mean pain score (40.0% vs. 51.8% and 4.2 vs. 4.8 in Group R and O, respectively) were not significantly different between groups. During 6-24 hpostoperative periods, the incidence of PONV (18.8% vs. 44.7%), severe emesis (11.8% vs. 29.4%) and mean pain score (2.8 vs. 3.8) were significantly lower in Group R compared to Group O, respectively. Overall, the incidence of PONV (42.4% vs. 63.5%) and severe emesis (20.0% vs. 43.5%) were significantly lower in Group R compared to Group O. The incidence of ‘satisfied’ patient during 0-6 h and 6-24 postoperative periods (55.3% vs. 28.2% and 82.4% vs. 58.8%) were significantly higher in Group R compared to Group O. 
CONCLUSION: Robotic thyroidectomy reduced the incidence and severity of PONV compared to open thyroidectomy during 0-24 postopertive periods.</dc:description>
<dc:description>연구 목적: 고전적 갑상선 절제술은 수술 후 오심, 구토의 발생 빈도가 70%에 이른다. 최근 소개된 가스를 사용하지 않고, 겨드랑이로 접근하는 Robotassisted 내시경적 갑상선 절제술은고전적 갑상선 절제술에 비해 여러 장점이 있어,증가하고 있다. 본 연구는 고전적 갑상선 절제술과 Robot-assisted 내시경적 갑상선 절제술을 시행 받는 여성 환자에서 술 후 오심, 구토의 발생 빈도를 비교하였다.
연구 방법: 후향적, 이중 맹검의 방법으로 고전적 갑상선 절제술 (그룹 O) 또는 Robot-assisted 내시경적 갑상선 절제술 (그룹 R) 을 시행 받는 20~60세 170명의 여성을 선출하였다. Sevoflurane과 Air, oxygen을 이용하여 표준적인 마취를 시행하였다. 수술 후 0-24시간 동안 PONV의 발생률과 강도, (오심,구역/구토) 통증의 강도, 추가 항 구토제의 필요 여부, 만족도를 평가하였다.
결과: 수술 후 0-6시간 동안 오심, 구토의 발생률과 평균 통증 점수는 (40% vs. 51.8% 그리고 4.2 vs. 4.8 각각 그룹 R, 그룹 O) 두 그룹 간 유의한 차이는 없었다. 수술 후 6-24시간 동안 오심, 구토의 발생률(18.8% vs. 44.7%), 심한 구토 (11.8% vs. 29.4%), 평균 통증 점수 (2.8 vs 3.8)는 그룹 R에서 그룹 O 보다 유의하게 낮았다. 수술 후 0-6시간과 6-24시간의 만족도는 (55.3% vs. 28.2% 그리고 82.4% vs. 58.8%) 그룹 O와 비교하여 그룹 R에서 유의하게 높았다.
결론: Robot-assisted 내시경적 갑상선 절제술이 고전적 갑상선 절제술과 비교하였을 때 수술 후 0-24시간 동안 오심, 구토의 발생률과 강도를 감소시킨다.</dc:description>
<dc:description>ABSTRACT i 

TABLE OF CONTENTS ii 

LIST OF TABLES iii 

I. INTRODUCTION 1 

II. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2 

A. MATERIALS 2 

B. METHODS 2 

C. STATISTICS 3 

III. RESULTS 5 

IV. DISCUSSION 10 

V. CONCLUSION 13 

REFERENCES 14 

국문요약 17</dc:description>
<dc:description>Master</dc:description>
<dc:date>2013-12-19</dc:date>
<dc:date>2013-12-19</dc:date>
<dc:date>2013</dc:date>
<dc:date>2013</dc:date>
<dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
<dc:type>Theses</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/8655</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>http://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr:9080/dcollection/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000014912</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>000000014912</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
</oai_dc:dc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>