246 598

Cited 5 times in

Comparison of the Pentax AirwayScope and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with a normal airway

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, J-
dc.contributor.authorKwak, HJ-
dc.contributor.authorLee, JY-
dc.contributor.authorChang, MY-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SY-
dc.contributor.authorKim, JY-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T01:49:20Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-24T01:49:20Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ajou.ac.kr/handle/201003/15983-
dc.description.abstractVarious videolaryngoscopes (VLs) have been developed to provide a better laryngeal view and facilitate difficult intubations. The goal of this study was to compare 2 VLs, the Pentax AWS and the McGrath VL, with respect to intubation time and ease of intubation.One hundred forty patients aged 19 to 65 years (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I or II), who required tracheal intubation for elective surgery, were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups: the Pentax AWS (n = 70) or the McGrath VL (n = 70). The primary outcome was time to intubation (TTI) measured by a blind observer. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS), percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale, glottic grade, use of optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OELM), and ease of intubation were also recorded.The Pentax AWS provided a better laryngeal view than the McGrath VL with respect to the Cormack-Lehane (CL) glottic grade (1/2a/2b) (63/7/0 vs 43/24/3, P < .001) and the POGO scale (median [interquartile range, IQR]) (100 [100-100] vs 100 [80-100], P < .001). The IDS was significantly lower in the Pentax AWS group compared with the McGrath VL group (median [IQR]) (0 [0-0] vs 0 [0-1], P < .001). However, the TTI was similar in both the Pentax AWS and McGrath VL groups (median [IQR]) (30 [27-34] vs 32 [27-35] seconds, P = .440). OELM and ease of intubation were also similar between the 2 groups.The Pentax AWS offered a superior laryngeal view compared with the McGrath VL. There was no significant difference in either the intubation time or ease of intubation using these 2 devices in patients with normal airways.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHEquipment Design-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIntubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHLaryngoscopes-
dc.subject.MESHLaryngoscopy-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSingle-Blind Method-
dc.subject.MESHVideo Recording-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titleComparison of the Pentax AirwayScope and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with a normal airway-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.pmid29145308-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704853/-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이, 숙영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김, 종엽-
dc.type.localJournal Papers-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000008713-
dc.citation.titleMedicine-
dc.citation.volume96-
dc.citation.number46-
dc.citation.date2017-
dc.citation.startPagee8713-
dc.citation.endPagee8713-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMedicine, 96(46). : e8713-e8713, 2017-
dc.identifier.eissn1536-5964-
dc.relation.journalidJ000257974-
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine
Files in This Item:
29145308.pdfDownload

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse