Implementation of Trauma Center and Massive Transfusion Protocol Improves Outcomes for Major Trauma Patients: A Study at a Single Institution in Korea

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of the implementation of a trauma center and massive transfusion protocol (TCMTP) in a developing country without a well-established trauma system. METHODS: We included patients (1) aged >15 years, (2) with an Injury Severity Score >15, (3) who received >/=10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) within 24 h, (4) who directly visited our institution from 2010 to 2016, and (5) who survived for >/=24 h. Patients treated during the post-TCMTP period (2015-2016) were compared with historical groups treated pre-TCMTP (2010-2012) and interim-TCMTP (2013-2014). Demographics, transfusion and fluid therapy performance, and clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups. RESULTS: Overall, 190 patients were included: 64, 64, and 62 patients in the pre-TCMTP, interim-TCMTP, and post-TCMTP groups, respectively. Comparison between the three groups revealed significant differences in the fresh-frozen plasma/PRBC ratio (p = 0.001) and crystalloid infusion (p = 0.007): these variables gradually increased from pre- to post-TCMTP. Conversely, colloid infusion showed a reduction post-TCMTP (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that the 90-day survival rate was significantly higher in the post-TCMTP group (pre-TCMTP: 45.3 vs. 75.8%, p = 0.001: interim-TCMTP: 56.3 vs. 75.8%, p = 0.027). In Cox regression hierarchical survival analysis, TCMTP showed a hazard ratio for mortality of 0.380 after adjusting for all potentially confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that building trauma centers and establishing a massive transfusion protocol according to the specific situations of a country will help improve outcomes for major trauma patients, even in developing countries without a well-established trauma system.