0 138

Cited 0 times in

Blood Volume Change and Side Effects during Various Sodium Ramping in Hemodialysis

Other Title
다양한 고염투석액을 이용한 혈액투석시 혈액량의 변화 및 부작용 발생의 관찰
Authors
Ma, KA; Kim, HS; Kim, MS; Kim, SJ; Jeong, CG; Kim, HJ; Ko, KH; Kim, SD; Ji, SB; Shin, GT; Kim, DH
Citation
Taehan Sinjang Hakhoe chi, 18(3):436-444, 1999
Journal Title
Taehan Sinjang Hakhoe chi; The Korean journal of nephrology; 대한신장학회지
ISSN
1225-0015
Abstract
Chronic hemodialysis patients frequently experience hemodialysis(HD)-related side

effects caused by excessive ultrafiltration and abrupt change of osmolality. Sodium

ramping in HD is known to reduce ultrafiltration-related side effects, but it frequently induces symptoms related to sodium overload. We wanted to know the relationship between blood volume changes and the side effects related to ultra-filtration during hemodialysis and whether we can individualize various sodium ramping methods according to the effect of change in blood volume(BV) and side effects of sodium

ramping. We studied 9 hypotension-prone patients during HD. The duration of the study lasted (or 5 weeks, each week using different sodium ramping protocols: protocol 1; dialysate [Na+] of 140mEq/L, protocol 2; dialysate [Na+] same as the predialysis seam [Na+], protocol 3; dialysate [Na+] was 20mEq/L greater than that of the patient's serum for 1hr, 10mEq/L greater than patient's serum [Na+] for 2hr and den the same as patient's serum [Na+] for the last 1hr, protocol 4; at the beginning of

dialysis, dialysate sodium was ramped to 20mEq/L above the patient's seam sodium and

then on a straight linear fashion lowered to the predialysis serum [Na+] at the end of dialysis, protocol 5; sodium was constantly ramped to 10 mEq/L above serum [Na+]. We measured the △BV with Crit-Line IIR(In-Line Diagnostics, Corp., Riverdale, USA), the blood Pressure during each HD and interdialytic weight gain.

We documented subjective symptoms which occurred during the 5 treatment protocols

by patient's questionnaire after each HD.

The results were as follows.

1) The mean age of the patients(M : F=3 : 6) was 54.1 years and 6 patiens were diabetics.

2) There was no significant difference in the △BV among the 5 protocols in both

whole study population and individual. Neither was there a statistically signigicant difference in the △BV with respect to hypotension during HD.

3) There were no episodes of hypotension(P value <0.001) with protocols 3, 4, 5

compared to protocols 1 and 2.

4) Three patients during protocols 4 and 5 experienced more thirst after HD than

during protocol 1 and one Patient during protocol 4, 5 had more interdialytic weight gain than the protocol 1. As a whole, patients while on protocol 4 & 5 experienced more thirst than protocol 1 but patients during protocol 3 experienced the same degree of thirst as protocol 1.

In summary, sodium ramping reduced HD-related side effects but this benefit could

not be explained on the basis of blood volume change measured by the Crit-Line IIR.

protocol 3 may be more appropiate sodium ramping method in 4 of the 9 patients. These

data suggest that protocol 3 may be used before protocol 4, 5 when we apply sodium

ramping to the patients who frequently have hypotension during HD.
Keywords
Blood volume changeSodium rampingCrit-lineSide effects
Appears in Collections:
Journal Papers > School of Medicine / Graduate School of Medicine > Nephrology
Full Text Link
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse